<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writerland &#187; Self-Publishing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meghanward.com/blog/tag/self-publishing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meghanward.com/blog</link>
	<description>Reading, Writing, and Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Self-Publishing the Way to Go?</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2012/02/09/is-self-publishing-the-way-to-go/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2012/02/09/is-self-publishing-the-way-to-go/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Author Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Berkeley editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constance Hale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarah Baker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media classes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syn and Syntax]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=4103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Today I have a wonderful post from Sarah Baker, a former editor for Viking/Penguin and Simon &#038; Schuster in New York, via Constance Hale over at Sin and Syntax. If you haven&#8217;t visited Sin and Syntax yet, go check out the Salon. It&#8217;s full of great articles about writing and publishing like Gianmaria Fanchini&#8217;s post [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Today I have a wonderful post from Sarah Baker, a former editor for Viking/Penguin and Simon &#038; Schuster in New York, via Constance Hale over at <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com">Sin and Syntax</a>. If you haven&#8217;t visited Sin and Syntax yet, go check out the <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/">Salon</a>. It&#8217;s full of great articles about writing and publishing like Gianmaria Fanchini&#8217;s post on <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/book-advances/">sliding book advances</a>, which follows up on my <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/11/02/author-advances-survey-results/">Author Advance Survey Results</a>, and Constance Hale&#8217;s post on <a href="http://www.sinandsyntax.com/sin-and-syntax-salon/breaking-in/">breaking into the publishing world</a>. And now &#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Is Self-Publishing the Way to Go?</p>
<p>With a sidebar on what you need to know to do it yourself.</p>
<p>By Sarah Baker</strong></p>
<p>Go to any panel on book publishing these days, and you’ll hear the hoopla over self-publishing. Easy to do! More control! A bigger cut of the profits! At a time when advances aren’t exactly advancing, editors are often too over-worked, and publicists are spending the house’s dimes on blockbusters, self-publishing sure sounds tempting. Add to this the allure of royalty rates of 70 percent or higher instead of the 15 percent (at most) from traditional publishers, and it’s no wonder all writers aren’t going indie.</p>
<p>But, wait. Self-publishing might be the word on everyone’s lips, but is it right for you?</p>
<p>“You have to decide what your goals are,” said thriller-writer and self-publishing guru Barry Eisler at a lecture in November 2011 at the Park Plaza hotel in Boston. For him, it seemed like a no-brainer. He had already published three books with a traditional, or what he calls “legacy,” publisher. He has a following, developed when he pounded the pavement one summer, visited 500 bookstores, and called on 1,200 bookstores in 40 states. Other things in his favor: His wife is a literary agent, so he has access to publishing professionals.</p>
<p>As if his platform weren’t enough already, the press from his decision to turn down $500,000 from St. Martin’s and go indie practically made him a household name. The mighty-marketing-machine Amazon is his publisher. He likes control. He likes business. He’s clearly very good at it.</p>
<p>But not everyone has built what Eisler has. For first-time authors, like Boston Globe reporter Billy Baker, who is armed with a literary agent and a nonfiction book idea, an advance from a traditional publisher is necessary for him to take time off from work to report and write. “I don’t have 50 grand in the bank,” he said.</p>
<p>Other authors make the point that they want the strong winds of a trusted publisher in their authorial sails. Pagan Kennedy, author of ten books including Spinsters and Black Livingstone, doubts she would ever go indie. “If you can live with 1,000 readers and not making any money, then fine. But, if you want an audience of 20,000 for your book—how do you get that?” she said.</p>
<p>So what should a writer weigh when considering self-publishing?</p>
<p>“Self-publishing had a stigma,” said Eve Bridburg, literary agent and founder of Grub Street, Inc., an independent literary-arts center in Boston.  But she points out some critical new factors: increasingly sophisticated self-publishing tools are available; you can distribute via the Internet (and not just via the back of a station wagon); Twitter and Facebook can help to spread the word. Then there is the payoff: higher royalty rates. So many more serious writers are self-publishing, she added, that Grub is now offering workshops not only in the craft of writing but in marketing and publishing, as well.</p>
<p>Many people are taking the plunge. An article by Jeffrey A. Trachtenberg in the Wall Street Journal cites an estimate by R. R. Bowker, which tracks the publishing business: the number of self-published titles exploded 160 percent from 2006 to 2010 (that is, from 51,237 to 133,036.)</p>
<p>Some recent success stories—Amanda Hocking and John Locke, in addition to Barry Eisler—have helped fuel the movement. And let’s not forget that some historic bestsellers (What Color is Your Parachute and The Elements of Style, for example) started out as do-it-yourselfers (DIY), the old-school name for the self-published. They were acquired by traditional houses after they were already successful.</p>
<p>Sales figures for self-published books are difficult to track, and hard to interpret, since people choose this route for all sorts of reasons. Many are printing 10 copies of a memoir for the family or 100 for the business. Amazon.com doesn’t share overall sales figures of books, according to Brittany Turner of their public relations department. But, in an email she was willing to say that “John Locke and Amanda Hocking have both sold more than 1 million books using Kindle Direct Publishing (KDP), 12 KDP authors have sold more than 200,000 books and 30 KDP authors have sold more than 100,000.” Over at Amazon’s self-publishing service site, CreateSpace, she added, former New Orleans mayor Ray Nagin self-published his memoir Katrina’s Secrets, which hit the Top 100 Best Sellers in Books on Amazon the week of its release.</p>
<p>(If you’ve seen anyone report on the other end of the spectrum—that is, the number of self-published authors who never surpass their break-even point—please post links in the comments section! The more solid information we all have, the better.)</p>
<p>Even traditional publishers are capitalizing on the popularity. Book Country is Penguin Books new foray into the do-it-yourself world. It’s a place for genre fiction writers to circulate their work, get feedback, and buy self-publishing services. “Self-publishing is a trend that isn’t going away,” said Book Country president Molly Barton to Calvin Reid of Publishers Weekly. </p>
<p>But all of this takes time and ingenuity. Martha McPhee, author of Dear Money and three other novels, said self-publishing would be like pushing a boulder up a mountain, and she wouldn’t know where to begin. Claire Messud, New York Times-bestselling author of The Emperor’s Children, equates self-publishing with home schooling.</p>
<p>Would you consider home schooling?</p>
<p><strong>SIDEBAR: Should you self-publish?</strong></p>
<p>If you want a professional-looking book with a chance of success you’ll need four things: Time, Money, Connections, and Gumption. Traditional publishers have been in the business for a long time and a book contract, despite that many authors accuse them of everything from neglect to abandonment, guarantees a professional process. You’ll have a well-oiled machine behind you so that you can focus on writing and promotion. If you want to replace them you’ll need to:</p>
<p>            1.	Hire a load of people if you aren’t a jack-of-all-trades: Editor, copyeditor, jacket designer, interior designer, publicist, marketer, rights salesperson (for foreign and first serial), Web site designer, printer, and distributor (for print books). If you’re publishing nonfiction you might need a lawyer to check for libel and an indexer to create an index. But buyer beware—these people work for you, so make sure they tell you what you need to hear and not what you want to hear.</p>
<p>            2.	Verify your account balance and uncap your pen—you’ll be writing a lot of checks.</p>
<p>            3.	Buy a Starbucks Card or a Nespresso machine. With the amount of work this will involve, you’ll need your caffeine. Self-publishing is akin to starting your own business.</p>
<p>            4.	Do the hustle. Work your friends on Facebook, your followers on Twitter, your old colleagues in the media, your local librarian, and your buddies in the bookstores to spread the word and buy the book.</p>
<p>Good luck.</p>
<p>{Formerly a book editor at Viking/Penguin and Simon &#038; Schuster in New York City, Sarah Baker is now a freelance writer and an independent radio producer. She lives in Cambridge, Massachusetts.}</p>
<p><em>Thanks Sarah and Constance for a great post! What about you? Have you self-published? What has your experience been?</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2012/02/09/is-self-publishing-the-way-to-go/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editor Alan Rinzler &amp; Literary Agent Andy Ross On All Things Publishing</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/10/18/editor-alan-rinzler-literary-agent-andy-ross-talk-about-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/10/18/editor-alan-rinzler-literary-agent-andy-ross-talk-about-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Oct 2011 08:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Craft of Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Author Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Videos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alan Rinzler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Andy Ross]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=3351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>First off, we have a winner for a signed copy of A Thousand Lives: The Untold Story of Hope, Deception and Survival in Jonestown by New York Times bestselling author Julia Scheeres. That winner is:</p> <p>MOLLY!</p> <p>Molly, e-mail me your full name and address, and I will pop the book in the mail to you [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, we have a winner for a signed copy of <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/10/11/new-york-times-bestselling-author-julia-scheeres/"> <em>A Thousand Lives: The Untold Story of Hope, Deception and Survival in Jonestown</em></a> by New York Times bestselling author Julia Scheeres. That winner is:</p>
<p><font size="4">MOLLY!</font></p>
<p>Molly, e-mail me your full name and address, and I will pop the book in the mail to you by the end of the week.</p>
<p>Now, I have a special treat for you. If you&#8217;re a writer, editor, agent, or publisher, you&#8217;re probably familiar with these two legendary figures in publishing: <a href="http://alanrinzler.com/blog/">Alan Rinzler</a>, a developmental editor who has edited classics like Toni Morrison&#8217;s <em>The Bluest Eye</em> and Tom Robbins&#8217; <em>Jitterbug Perfume</em>, and <a href="http://andyrossagency.wordpress.com/">Andy Ross</a>, former owner of Cody&#8217;s Books in Berkeley and current owner of the <a href="http://andyrossagency.com/">Andy Ross Literary Agency</a>. Today, I give you a video of a conversation between Alan (left) and Andy (right) that runs about 55 minutes. I&#8217;ve transcribed the whole thing in case you&#8217;d rather read it (but please foregive typos. I did not proofread.) It&#8217;s a fabulous conversation that touches on everything from mistakes writers make to blogging and self-publishing. So pop in those earphones and enjoy!</p>
<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/30292039?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0" width="400" height="300" frameborder="0" webkitAllowFullScreen allowFullScreen></iframe>
<p><a href="http://vimeo.com/30292039">Alan Rinzler &#038; Andy Ross</a> from <a href="http://vimeo.com/meghanward">Meghan Ward</a> on <a href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> I want to say that Andy and I disagree about everything, but I defer to him because he’s older than me.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> That is a lie. That is a vile canard.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Fire away.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>First of all, we have Alan Rinzler, legendary editor extraordinaire and Andy Ross, former owner of Cody’s Books and current owner of Andy Ross Literary Agency. We’re going to talk about publishing, writing, and blogging. First of all, can you guys talk about the changes that have taken place in the publishing industry in the last few years—Borders have closed, author advances have plummeted, new authors have turned to self-publishing, some agents are becoming book packagers for self-published authors …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> All of the above are true. I’ve talked to other agents and they all talk like the sky is falling.  They don’t know quite what to do because agents are because agents are classic intermediaries and the world is becoming disintermediated, so there’s a lot of soul-searching going on. Because I’m a new agent, for me it’s all new and great and everything’s an opportunity. So I haven’t quite figured out yet where I belong.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Disintermediated meaning?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Disintermediated is a term of art used by Internet gurus—it’s not used much anymore because it didn’t pan out—they believed what the Internet would do is disintermediate, that people would buy products directly rather than through a publisher or a department store.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> But don’t you think that is happening now? For one thing, readers now can directly access, and authors often want them to, reach them directly. One of the biggest changes, one of the hugest changes I see—I need an editor—one of the major changes I see is that for the first time, authors and readers can have a direct contact. That’s a tremendously huge change. It changes the way books are sold and it often changes the way books are written.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>That’s a classic example of disintermediation, yes, that is happening. And the whole trend toward self-publishing, which is obviously the same principal. The mediator is the publisher—I don’t know if it’s being eliminated, but the writer has become the publisher.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> There was a piece in the New York Times that <a href="http://www.perseusbooksgroup.com/perseus/home.jsp">Perseus</a> has started a self-publishing division, joining Bloomsbury and many other companies in offering authors a self-publishing resource where they get 70 percent of the royalties and the author is the publisher—and they provide some services if you pay for them, just like iUniverse or Exlibris or Author Solutions or Lulu or Amazon. There’s a huge industry now of people who are getting big-time authors as self-published clients. Now, the interesting thing about this article is that Perseus announced that they have a deal with Janklow Nesbitt, which is one of the biggest and most powerful agencies in New York. I’ve known Lynn Nesbitt since she was a kid and she’s had many very famous clients that I’ve published, and many that I wish I’d published. And they made a deal to allow their big-time authors to self-publish through Perseus. That’s amazing. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, what’s happening with these big agencies is they represent a huge amount of books and many of them are out of print. There’s no other access to them and getting an e-book up and running is trivial. Essentially, if you have a Word file, you hit a button and an hour later it’s in a number of different formats. And if you don’t have a Word file—I did this the other day—for $60 I sent a book of a friend of mine—and it was not an easy book to format—I sent it to an OCR company. Two weeks later they sent it back as a Word file. It wasn’t completely perfect, but it was really good. The author had to edit it, but after an edit job, it was ready to go. It’s very easy. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> In terms of changes in the book business, just to pull back a little, when I started in the business it was kind of a boy’s club.  It was a Jewish boy’s club, too. All of those conspiracy theories are true. The book business has always been controlled by Jews. The only non-Jew around was Nelson Doubleday. And he hired a lot of Jews. Alfred Knopf and Bennet Cerf and Richard Simon—and all of those guys. And they were smart, funny guys who were hustlers. They were making a living doing crosswords and cookbooks and golf books—whatever. They were not literary giants. And they were not in it of the art, although they managed to publish some great books and those hearken back to the golden age of the book business. Also there were practically no women in 1962 in any position except for secretaries. First of all, you don’t have to be Jewish anymore, although it helps. And secondly, the women are now many of the top executives. It’s preponderant. If you go to a convention or a conference, most of the people are women. There are a lot of reasons for that, but it’s definitely a big change besides these other changes in technology. We didn’t have computers, obviously, or calculators. You didn’t have copy machines—everything was really different.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>One of the things I’ve thought about is that I’m wondering how much literary fashion has to do with the social make-up of the editorial. Most of the iconic literary writers of the 60s and 50s were Jewish men and that was when most of the editors were men. And now most of the editors are women who are 30-45, they’re not all Jewish, their names are frequently Stacy, Tracy, and Jennifer. They tended to go to Ivy League schools, for some reason, Brown shows up a lot. And the great literary writers now are women. I wonder if that has something to do with it.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> It’s true. I think in many ways that’s a good thing, but the pendulum has shifted. I think Oprah Winfrey has a lot to do with that, also. Not to be snarky exactly, but there’s a whole school of memoirs and novels about women as victims and men as insensitive brutes. It really brings out the worst in me personally because I get so tired of that. And then all the sensitive men are gay guys or feminists or something, and it really is annoying.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, I don’t feel so bad about that. When it comes right down to it, I think when it comes right down to it, men are brutes. But one of the things that I think is interesting is that if you think about literary fiction today, it is essentially women’s fiction. They call it upmarket women’s fiction, and that’s what fiction is. Men read, but they tend to read manly books, like thrillers and golf tips. Although women read more mysteries.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>The truth is, these are all speculative theories. There’s no hard data, there’s no real research on any of this, but if you look at the bestseller lists, that’s what you’re seeing.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well there is research on demographics of readers, and it’s mostly women.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>That’s true.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> And recently Justin Cronin, who had won the PEN/Hemingway and the Whiting awards for his literary novels started writing post-apocalyptic vampire novels. What do you think of that?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I think that’s where the money is. Although it’s not going to last forever. I think that train is leaving the station. I’ve been working on young adult books, and the only young adult book I’ve gotten published recently is a zombie novel, which, interestingly enough, Hollywood is very interested in.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>We disagree slightly. Science fiction has always bee popular. Some serious writers have written science fiction—Ray Bradbury, Arthur C. Clarke, Robert Heinlen and some others, and what’s called now “paranormal/ zombie/post-apocalyptic,” it’s just another term—as far as I’m concerned—for the tradition of science fiction, which has always been popular. I don’t think you can jump on a trend either …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> If you jump on a trend, it’s too late.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> … it’s over. But what really counts, and this is what hasn’t changed in the book business, is that a story is a story. If it’s a good story, if it’s well written, if it keeps you turning the pages, it has great characters and you become engaged in it, the mythic science fiction conventions are consistent so it makes sense within the fantasy … it’ll sell. It’s just as hard to do it now as it always was, whether you self-publish or whether you go with a commercial publisher.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>More and more literary novelists, though, are turning to genre fiction. Have you seen that?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I disagree with that. I think a lot of literary novelists are writing mysteries, which is one of the genres, but they write it in a literary style, and if I got one of them, and I have gotten them, I would tend to send it to a literary editor, not a genre editor.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> We should make a distinction between hack pulp genres, like Harlequin romances and serious romances. Because it’s the same genre, there’s really a difference … Margaret Atwood writes science fiction and so does Doris Lessing. That’s a little different from genre fiction or science fiction.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> I’ve been doing a lot of work with young adult, which is a genre, and they say not to follow trends and I believe that, but I also look at the deals that come down every day on Publisher’s Marketplace and probably two-thirds of the deals in young adult are paranormal. And almost all of the readership in Young Adult is girls. It’s very hard to get a book published about a boy.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> Science Fiction used to be kind of a boy’s genre.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> What I’m finding out now, and I’ve talked to a lot of young adult editors, is that boys read a lot—and one of the classifications is middle grade, which is usually about 9-14—boys read a lot until they’re about 13 years old, and after that they either go straight to Stephen King or they stop reading entirely and play video games, so that the young adult genre, which is relatively new and extremely robust, about 80 percent of the readers are girls.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Well, I loved Nancy Drew books when I was a kid. Young adult books have been around—Robert Louis Stephenson …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>But they didn’t call them young adult books. As a genre, as a term of art, it’s relatively new.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> So you don’t think customers’ reading habits are changing?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>They’re changing to be e-books. There’s a real shift. People either have an e-book or intend to buy an e-book. It’s really happening.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> But as far as the types of books people are reading, whether they’re e-books or print, do you think people’s tastes are changing?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong> I recently did a post on the bestseller lists. Even the New York Times recognizes that now by having 23 or 24 bestseller lists because of that diversity. And they’re all selling vigorously within a certain plateau. The fact is all book sales are down. The first six months of the year, the AAP …  APA … what is it?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>The Association for American Publishers.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Yes, announced that trade book sales are down about 6 percent overall. E-book sales are up, and that compensates for something, but generally, book sales have declined. Maybe because of the economy or because people are reading free stuff …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> they haven’t declined that much. There was another survey that went over three years or something and it was about 2 or 3 percent. That surprises me because I think the Internet has killed people’s attention span, and reading a book requires an attention. And I think, Alan can tell you, that there’s a lot of pressure now, for people who are writing novels, there’s a lot of talk about word count. They want shorter novels because of that. I heard somebody who wrote a historical novel, where you can usually get by with bigger word counts … the UK edition of their book was a hundred pages longer than the American edition because of people’s attention spans.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> I hate to hear that because a book should be as long as it needs to be, and some books really need to be long. One of the reasons, if you’re doing an actual book, is that paper is so expensive. There are a lot of technical problems in the book business that are really making it a crazy business. Books are returnable—why are they returnable?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> As a bookseller, I can spend an hour or two talking about why they are returnable.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Because no one would take any if they weren’t.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>That is true.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzer:</strong> Also, the amount of time that publishers are holding books in a store before returning them is shrinking, and that’s not good because sometimes it takes a while for a book to catch on.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>This is a new subject. There was a survey, which I write about in my blog when I see them—most of them are in Publishers’ Weekly—most books are not bought online. Only about 20 percent of books are bought online. You’d think with all the talk that it’s the opposite, and it is changing for sure. Just last year, Amazon supplanted Barnes &#038; Noble as the largest single venue for books. But one of the things that is interesting, and I know Alan has written about this as well, is that—although we may not agree on this—there was another recent survey that said that only 20 percent of books bought online are impulse buys. Forty percent of books in bookstores are impulse buys, and recently I had a conversation with Chip Gibson, who is president of Random House Children’s Books, the largest publisher of children’s books in the world, and he said that 80 percent of children’s books are impulse buys. And they’re very concerned about the fact that bookstores are disappearing. They have a concept they talk about, discoverability, and it doesn’t work well online. Amazon spent millions of dollars with these books that flash on that say, “If you like this, then you’ll love that,” but it doesn’t work all that well.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Well, you can’t browse. You can’t flip through it.<br />
<strong><br />
Andy Ross: </strong>Well, they give you five pages, but it doesn’t work.<br />
<strong><br />
Alan Rinzler:</strong> There’s nothing like going to a bookstore and looking through a book. You just can’t beat that.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>And bookstores are going out o business every day—obviously, Borders.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Well, here’s a trend that you must appreciate. Whereas Borders is closed and Barnes &#038; Nobles is hurting—and they are hurting—independent bookstores are flourishing.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> They’re closing, too.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Some are closing, but those that are smart, that are surviving, are doing really well. I was on a panel last Wednesday at the Northern California Book Publishers Marketing Association. It’s a very lively group, and there’s a panel of independent bookstore people—the Booksmith on Haight Ashbury, Mrs. Dalloway’s, which is right down here on Elmwood, which is a great store, and, of course, Book Passage. They are really hardworking, smart people who have figured out how to make money as independent bookstores. They do events, they cultivate their community, they respond to the local interests, they are able to have an identity and a personality that works for them.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, it is true that the smaller bookstores seems to be more robust than the larger bookstores. Stores like Cody’s had huge overhead. And the book business changed. And in a lot of ways the changes were a perfect storm. They all cut against what bookstores are good at. The smaller stores have low overhead and they ca survive and, in some cases, prosper, but I think the trends in the book business are not favorable toward independent stores … any kinds of bookstores.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>And now a lot of the independent bookstores have Google e-books. Do you think that’s going to help save the bookstores?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> I’d like to believe that. My wife works at Book Passage, and I use an e-book most of the time just because I figured I should understand how the future works. I recently started reading a regular book. I hadn’t done one in a few months …</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> It smells better.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>The experience of reading a regular book is much better than an e-book. You have black on white instead of dark gray on light gray, although there are some advantages to e-books as well. Reading a book was like going to Chez Panisse instead of the doggy diner. But you can get books from Google books through independent bookstores, and, for the most part, the prices are the same as they are on Amazon, which is unusual. Amazon has succeeded by cutting prices and being willing to lose money in order to gain market share.  But publishers have adopted a new plan—it used to be violation of anti-trust, but it’s not anymore—where they can set the prices. So you’re in a situation where if you buy an e-book from Book Passage, it’s the same price as Amazon, so people should do it. Unfortunately, I don’t think it’s having that much of an impact.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>But it’s happening. Everything is changing. I don’t think anybody can tell what it’s going to be like a year from now. A year ago, I don’t think anybody would have predicted that Janklow and Nesbitt were going to make a deal to self-publish books of their best authors whose books were out of print or who wanted to make more money on their royalties. It’s really amazing—a year ago …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Yeah, I’m having a fight with another agent about it/ One of my clients has some out-of-print books and I’d like to just put them up—he wants to put them up—but he foolishly promised another agent that he had the rights to it, and they’re not doing anything.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Well, everything is negotiable. Give them a piece of the action.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, they say they’re going to do something, but they haven’t. Agents are very much involved in that. Smashwords and all of these new companies are setting themselves up so that agents can be a key part of the process. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>You know, what’s interesting about the big changes in the book business is that they came from the ground up. Book publishers did not plan to have e-books, to have a direct access between authors and readers so that every author has to have his own website now, and their own blog and their own self-marketing plan. All of that just happened because of the technology and because of the people figuring out. And that’s just really interesting. And publishers have been reluctant, and late, getting on board. For years, I worked for a company that shall remain nameless—actually, it was John Wiley and everyone felt the same way. They would never post anything for free. Are you kidding? A sample chapter? Forget it. And now, of course, you can get more than a sample chapter and everybody does it, including Wiley. So there’s been a lot of dinosaur thinking and fear of technology and wanting to do it the old way for publishers and agents and editors and everybody in the business because they’re not math and science majors—none of them, for the most part—they’re English majors.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> They went to Brown!</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>They don’t feel comfortable doing stuff like converting to six different formats, even though it’s not that hard to do. Or reading an e-book where you flip with your thumb like that. And the iPad, by the way, has very good black and white delineation.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> I’d love to have an iPad. I have a Sony Reader, by the way.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Aren’t they as sharp?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, they’re like a Kindle, it’s dark gray on light gray.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> I love my iPad.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> So what do you think about the e-book pricing? Because a lot of e-books now that you buy through Amazon or through Google e-books are only a dollar cheaper than the hardcover. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> A lot of them are $.99, too.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>Well, those are the self-published books. But the ones coming through the Big 6 are often almost the same price as the hard cover.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> No, they’re not, actually. </p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> Well, the ones that I buy tend to be because the Amazon hardcover price is already so low.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, Amazon can no longer set the prices. That was a big breakthrough. Publishers don’t particularly like Amazon, correct me if I’m wrong.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Oh, they hate it. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Amazon is too powerful …</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> They’re also starting to compete with publishers.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>And they’re starting to compete with publishers, and they were trying to drive down the price of books for a number of reasons, but they were driving them down to the point where it devalued the value of books. So they (the publishers) made a side deal with Apple to increase the competition and they came up with a plan where they could control the price of the book. And Amazon resisted it. They wouldn’t sell one publisher for a week, and it terrified everyone. But it also showed the power that Amazon had.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Will you explain that? They can set the actual price? What about the discount?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> No, what they do and it’s legal—and it would never have been legal ten years ago—is that the publisher, instead of using a wholesale model—we sell you a book wholesale and you can price it anyway you want—they have created a system where the retailer, Amazon for instance, is an agent of the publisher. So what they do is the publisher sets a price, and the agent—Amazon—gets a 30 percent commission. The publisher controls the price of that book. And that’s happening with the major publishers. It’s not happening with smaller publishers. But now every one fo the six majors has this agency plan.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>For the actual book or the e-book?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>This is for the e-book. The actual book is still this wholesale plan. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> So for the e-book only. Therefore, the e-book prices are still kind of up.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> They’re often $12-, $13-, $14.99. They’re not as cheap as you would think.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Yeah, but the hardback prices can be $25.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Not if they’re discounted.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>Well the Amazon hardcovers are usually around $16, $17, so there’s not that big of a difference. And often the e-book is a dollar more than the paperback. You would think they’d be less expensive because they don’t have to print books, but they’re not.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Well, I think this hasn’t been resolved yet. The story’s not over. You’re right, it’s a little bit weird, and what’s going to ultimately influence it is that readers want a cheaper price. Everyone wants the price to be lower, and the self-published e-books, which are very substantial, are $.99, $1.99, $2.99. Why go to $7.99 or $12.99?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, I think you have to decide … first of all, a lot of these e-books are given away. One of the issues is the value of intellectual work. If somebody spends five years writing a novel, it’s probably worth more than $.99, whatever “worth” means. And this brings up another issue—and Alan has written about this, and so have I—of what is the value of the traditional publisher in the new world? What kind of value do they add? I went to New York and I was talking to … because again, there’s this philosophy of disintermediation, where you don’t need publishers anymore, they’re dinosaurs, they don’t really add value, they don’t promote books, what do they do? And I asked a bunch of editors about that, and they didn’t have very good answers about what value they’re adding. Mostly what they said—and there is something true about this—is that they provide a really good editorial experience, that a lot of these small press books are just kind of thrown up there, which is really true. It’s easy to get one of these small press books, but it’s difficult to sort out what’s good from this kind of ocean of mediocrity because, like everything else on the Internet, everyone’ san expert—it’s like Wikipedia.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>What do you mean by “a good editorial experience”? How can these New York editors say that when most of them don’t do any editing?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I used to think that, but I don’t think that’s true. What is true is that they expect the book to be perfect when they get it. It has to be well edited, and that’s why agents do add value. But once it is edited, they will—some of them—will do a lot of work editing it. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> You mean edit again?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Yeah, they will edit it additionally. I think if you look it in aggregate, if you buy a book from Knopf, it’s more likely to be a better book than if you buy a book from Smashwords. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Well, this is a complicated issue because many self-published authors are seeking developmental editors. There’s a whole new freelance profession of developmental editors. You know that [To Meghan Ward], and I know that. You have Zoe Rosenfeld. And that’s a whole business. And there’s a lot of other people I know who used to be acquisition editors and who are now doing developmental editing, and they’re being hired by self-published editors. </p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> Has your business increased since the self-publishing has grown?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Yes, it has, substantially. However, I still don’t really believe—and I can’t prove it exactly, but I’m pretty sure—from when I talk to editors and writers, that they’re not getting a lot of developmental editing from publishers because they’re in a hurry. They’re got to fill a quota. They’ve got a window of opportunity. They’ve got a list that has to be satisfied. They don’t want to mess around with something that has to be worked with for another year or two in development. They want to get it right into production. They’re in a hurry. They want a quick turnover of their investment, especially if they pay a lot of money.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>You’re right about that. If the book is flawed, if the concept of the book is flawed, they’re not going to spend a lot of energy before they acquire they book trying to figure out how to make it a good book. They will edit after they get it book, though, and they’ll put some time and energy into it.  Some of it’s developmental, but I’m finding I have to do a huge amount of developmental editing as an agent, and I think most of the agents who I respect are doing that—not necessarily the most famous agents, who are mostly interested in flipping contracts.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> So you’re willing to take on a book that needs some work?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I spend months. I just took on a novel which was really one of the best novels I ever read by a person who teaches creative writing, and we’ve been spending the last three months working on that book. You know, it’s really interesting, I’m finding that I get kind of intimidated by these people who teach graduate-level writing, but the truth is, anyone who’s been writing a novel for four years has lost all perspective. They seem to have no idea what characteristics are working for the reader or what’s just in their mind. And if you’ve read Anne Lamott’s wonderful Bird by Bird, she talked about <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/11/18/kfkd%E2%80%94the-editor-in-your-ear/">Radio KFKD</a>, which is in your ear. One side you’re hearing the siren song of self-aggrandizement, and on the other side, you’re hearing the rap music of self-loathing. You’ve lost all perspective. My role as an agent is to edit and tell them what’s working and what isn’t working.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> But you’re very unusual, Andy. I don’t think most agents do much editing, nor should they, because they don’t know what they’re doing.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I like to believe I added value to that book, and she said I did.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>I’m sure you did. And people who teach creative writing aren’t necessarily …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Oh, I’ve heard horror stories.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> It’s interesting, if you read Writer’s Digest or Poets &#038; Writers, there are so many MFA programs. You’d think it was like law school or medical school—although maybe that’s not as job-guaranteeing either—but there are so many writers taking degrees as if this will ensure them of success, and believe me, it doesn’t. </p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> So what do you think of MFA programs?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>If you need the discipline of having to write, you probably shouldn’t be a writer in the first place. You should have that discipline. I’m very skeptical of MFA programs, frankly.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> I’ve given panels are MFA programs, and I’ve worked with people who teach creative writing, and some of them are good and some of them … aren’t.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> What are the biggest problems you see in new author’s works?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>I think Andy touched on that—a lack of perspective and objectivity on their own work.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> But that’s true of experienced writers as well. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>That’s true, but if they’ve never written before … You know, there’s an irony. To be a writer, you have to be a bit of an egomaniac, and you have to be a bit obsessive, in order to sit down and devote yourself and ignore your family and your job or whatever else you’re doing, and just have the discipline to write four or five or six hours a day—or two or three. So you’re a little bit crazy to begin with. But new writers, in particular, are often so swept up in their own work that they don’t see what they’re doing. The biggest problem I see with beginning writers, though, is they don’t make a plan. They think if they close their eyes, the muse will come to them and put the pen on the paper, the fingers on the keyboard. The best writers I have worked with, the very best—Toni Morrison and Tom Robinson, yadda yadda—they all really think about what they’re doing ad try to make a plan and revise . An outline even, or some kind of storyboard or some kind of clear vision of their path—about where they’re going ,why they’re going and where it’s going to wind up—all those kind of structural narrative issues, try to get at least mostly resolved, subject to change, as you go along, but mostly resolve before beginning. I think that’s the biggest problem I see in writing.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, I think all of the writers I talk to, regardless of their experience, have no perspective. I wouldn’t have any perspective after those characters lived in my head for four or five years. What Alan does is very different from what I do, and I refer people to Alan. What I do is I come to the experience with a beginner’s mind. I read the book and try to think about how the reader would relate to that experience, because the reader is king, not the writer. And I try to give them the input as a reader—what was funny, what was boring, where I was getting lost. And it happens all the time from even from the best writers. Right?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Oh yeah. There are a lot of technical problems. One book I edited turned out to be really good, but it started with nothing but dialogue—nothing but dialogue, no breaks, no “he got up and walked across the room,” dialogue, dialogue, dialogue. You didn’t even know who was talking. Or some books have no dialogue. These are all things … too much visual description, not enough visual description, things like that. A lot of digression, a lot of unnecessary tangents, and back story problems. Like how do you tell what happened before the book started? That’s a major problem. Then you get these big information dumps at the beginning of a book.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Prologues.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Yeah. Heavy prologues. Or that formulaic opening car crash and then the big dump as to how it got to that point and then picking it up again. There are a lot of little structural problems that are very common.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>You know, I thought about that. I was working very closely with a friend of mine, whose book I sent to Alan. Neither she nor I had much experience writing novels, but we together worked through these problems of working through backstories and information dumps. One of the things that’s interesting is that I’ve been influenced by movies and the way they tell stories, and movies always have prologues because a film script is much shorter, and they have to find ways of getting the information out in a much simpler form.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>It’s easier, too, though.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Making a movie? Well, doing a prologue solves a lot of problems.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Yeah, because cinematically is goes much faster, and …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Dealing with backstory is what I find publishers are very tough on. They just think it’s lazy writing, and they don’t like it.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>But somehow it has to get in there, and it’s not easy to feather in people’s personality or history without telling about it in an encyclopedic way—foot notes.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> So, you’ve been getting a lot of writes who want to self-publish?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>I’ve been getting a lot of writers who want to take control of their destiny, who say I’m going to self-publish this book, but I know that it has to be a lot better than it is now, and I’m going to do this, but I want you to be an editor.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> Do you think the quality is as high as those who want to go through the traditional process?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Yes, absolutely. Absolutely The quality is not as high as a great writer who’s already been published, but the quality is as high as someone who says this is my first book, and I want an agent. And boy is that a frustrating experience for the most part, trying to get one.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Although Alain sent me some of his clients.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Yeah, and you didn’t take any of them!</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I didn’t take any of them, but you know, that happens.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> I make recommendations, but who listens to me?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Yeah, I get rejected a lot. Everything is hard to get published through traditional publishing. I get a lot of people who have good experiences publishing books that I just fall in love with, and I get a lot of rejections. It’s like my social life in high school. And people who are important historical figures with original information I get rejected. Pulitzer Prize winners.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> Do you worry that the agent will be obsolete five to ten years from now?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, I was worried about that, but … it used to be they hated literature agents. I think Alfred Knopf said a literary agent is to a publisher as a knife is to a throat. And now it’s the opposite. They consider the literary agents the gatekeepers. </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>They won’t look at a book unless it comes from an agent.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>And that’s where agents, good agents, add value. We do developmental editing. We work with them closely to write book proposals and in the process of writing the book proposal, which is a business plan, they have to do the developmental editing, at least in their mind, or the book proposals going to stink and I’m not going to be able to sell it.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> But here’s a change. I think everybody in traditional publishing now is much more risk-aversive than when I was a kid. They don’t’ want to make a long-term investment in their writer. They want something that’s a big hit now. They don’t want to spend a lot of time editing it. They don’t want to spend a lot of time selling it. Everything has to go faster because you’ve got those quarterly reports for publicly held capitalist companies, and you can’t just say well, this writer is going to be very successful in three years, I think. Therefore, there is a fear of failure, which is justified because most books do lose money, that causes people not to take as many chances. One thing that was true 40 or 50 years ago is that you would invest in a writer like Joe Heller because you thought his next book would be great. Or other great writers.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Faulkner is the example they use.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Fitzgerald. Hemingway. Their first books were not successful, but you did it because you wanted to get their third or fourth book. You don’t see very much of that anymore.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, the word that comes up a lot—particularly for nonfiction—is “platform.” Everything’s platform. Essentially, what it comes down to is they want people who are famous and who have access to media. Platform for me means two different things. Number one if you’re writing a history, you have an endowed chair at Harvard in history. The other form of platform, which I think is much more persuasive, is that you’re sleeping with Oprah’s hairdresser, that you have access to popular media. As a new agent, I have a much harder job because most of my clients—some of them have pretty good platforms—but most of them—I have to discover new talent. It’s very important, and publishers will tell you that it’s very important, but it’s also very hard to get the publishers to commit themselves to this new talent.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> It’s paradoxical. </p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>So what advice do you have for new writers on how to develop their platform?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, we’ve argued about that, haven’t we?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> No, I think we actually agreed.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>We argued and then agreed.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>You can develop a platform if you’re unknown online. That’s one way to develop a platform, by developing a personality, by becoming integrated into a community who have a shared interest—particularly that’s much easier in nonfiction. Although, a lot of fiction women writers and male writers develop a platform online by putting their work out and people reading it and developing people who like it and getting a following, so that by the time you get to a publisher you can say, “Hey, I’ve got 6000 hits a month.” That’s impressive. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, I don’t know how impressive that is because I was just reading<a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/09/27/is-blogging-a-waste-of-time/"> a very good blog entry about this</a>, and it is true, publishers expect you to do social media and to develop your own platform, but what I’m finding is there are certain limitations to that, that it’s hard to develop a platform if you don’t already have platform. I think I mentioned that a blog that would impress publishers, that would make the deal, was a blog that was getting 50-100,000 hits a day—and they would agree with that. I think you contacted Daniela Rapp, right?</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>Yeah, but she was talking per month, not per day. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Still, 50,000 hits a month …</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> That’s a big number.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> It’s a big number. Most people aren’t going to do that.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> No.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>I mean, they will publish other books. They don’t just make the decision based on the number of hits on the blog, but …</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Well, there are other ways to do platform. One is to win a literary prize of some kind. Another is to get published in a magazine or a literary journal or to get a really persuasive, incredible endorsement from somebody who’s really read the book and respects the writing. That’s hard to get. You have to be a good writer. But I have this kind of naïve feeling that virtue will triumph and that good writers will always emerge, that somehow, if they keep writing, the work will appear and be seen and be read and it will connect.<br />
<strong><br />
Andy Ross:</strong> Well, I agree with that. Because I’m a new agent and because I dwell in the world of new talent, the best I can do it find somebody who has talent—particularly in the world of fiction, where almost nothing gets published—literary fiction. And all I can hope to do is try to have them continue writing until something clicks—kismet or an editor falls in love with it. I was meeting with literary editors last time I was in New York and there was one who I respect a lot, and I asked her, “How many manuscripts does she read a year?” and she had a log and she said, “Last year I read about 250 manuscripts.” And I said, “How many of those ended up getting published?” And she said, “Two.” And I said, “How many of those 250 were good enough to get published?” and she said, “Over a hundred.” So that’s the kind of batting average we’re talking about. You’ve got to be good, that’s a given. You have to be good, but once you’re good, it goes into this acquisitions meeting and decisions get made that aren’t necessarily esthetic. The one book I loved, and it made it all the way to the acquisition meeting, got rejected because they said something like, “The subject was a little too dark for reading groups.” It was a marketing decision.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Yeah, if you’ve been to a few acquisition meetings, and I have, it’s really scary how much power … here’s a change in the book business. The change is that the balance of power in the company has shifted from editorial to sales and marketing, so that now the sales and marketing people have a kind of veto. I was executive editor at Wiley, and I could occasionally push through things that were coolly responded to by the sales and marketing people, but I did so at peril because they could kill a book by simply not selling it, by not pushing it into their accounts. They have too much power because they’re bean counters … and they’re very risk aversive. They want a book from an author that the last book sold a lot of copies because there’s something called <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nielsen_BookScan">BookScan</a>. You know what that is? The first thing that happens when a sales department, or an editor—anybody, gets a proposal is they look up the authors in BookScan. And very few authors look that good in BookScan, unless their last book did over 50- 75, 100,000 copies.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> You know, it’s a lot easier to sell a debut novel, where there’s no record on BookScan that to have somebody whose book bombed.</p>
<p>Alan Rinzler: Or just did midlist.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>They take books by the numbers, and I think there’s a reason for that, which is that the Barnes &#038; Noble buyers also look at BookScan, and they do the same thing. I used to do it at Cody’s even.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> You know what you sold of the last title. You have your own numbers.<br />
<strong><br />
Andy Ross: </strong>It’s the tyranny of numbers. I know some agents, if an author’s previous book didn’t do well, they’ll try to sell the book under a nom de plume.<br />
<strong><br />
Alan Rinzler: </strong>That’s crazy. How can you publicize the book then?<br />
<strong><br />
Andy Ross: </strong>Well, eventually the truth comes out.<br />
<strong><br />
Meghan Ward:</strong> So, both of you have blogs. Why do you have blogs?</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Well, for me, it gives me an opportunity to be a grouchy old man and vent occasionally. But actually I have to keep that under control, my wife says. For me, it’s primarily a way of stimulating and encouraging people to hire me as a freelance editor.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>And do you think your blog helps?<br />
<strong><br />
Alan Rinzler:</strong> Oh, absolutely. I get many many queries every day, most of which are not workable. But maybe one or two are workable, and if we can work it out and if it’s good enough, it’s a tremendous source of clients for me. Its’ my primary source of clients. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, I started my blog because my brother-in-law said as a marketing tool I needed a blog. And it turned out to be different because probably the way I am. Alan and Cheryl actually brought me in and decided to give me avuncular advice about how I was blowing it as a marketing tool. And Alan said, “What do you want to do? Do you want to make money, or do you want to sound off?” And, unfortunately, what I said is I think I want to sound off. And that’s pretty much what my blog has become. Although every once in a while I feel it incumbent upon me to provide the Writer’s Digest “9 Tips on How to Write a Query Letter.” The problem is I’m embarrassed to do it because there are only 20 tips in the world about what you need to know to write a query letter, and they seem to be recycled almost monthly in Writer’s Digest. I can’t spend my life writing tips about query letters, but I do it, and if you read my blog, you can get a lot of good information.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> But I think your blog is helpful to authors, and that’s what I try to do. There’s so much going on, there’s so many changes, that there’s stuff to write about for authors besides how to write a query letter.  My advice about query letters is don’t write one, period. End of story. I think query letters are a complete waste of time. Nobody reads them. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, I think they do read them, but I think people go around to these writers’ conferences where they charge money for how to write a query letter, and there really is only five things you need to know. They should be short, and they aren’t going to get you published, but … when I look at a query letter, I want to know three things. I want to know what’s the genre of the book, what’s it about, and why am I the right person to write that book. And frankly, why am I the right person to write that book is the first thing I’d look at.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> When I started my blog, self-publishing was pretty much still vanity publishing. It was for the lunatic fringe. And that was only three or four years ago. There’s been so much happening that authors need to hear about. I think the blog is not exactly self-serving always, but somehow a public service in some ways, which will show people that they ultimately do need to hire me (laughs.)</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> And do you recommend that writers trying to develop platform blog, or do you think the blogosphere is saturated at this point? </p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> Yes, but you don’t have to write every day. You don’t have to write what you had for breakfast. I think that that sort of Nathan Bransford model has died.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Nathan Bransford has a lot of fans, actually. But it’s hard. There are a number of agent’s blogs, and they feel they have to post every day, and they run out of material. I do it when I have something to say. It’s not always every day, or even every week.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>So do you think it’s worth a writer’s time to blog, even if they’re not going to get that 50,000 hits a month?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> I think you blog because you like to blog, because you feel you have something to say.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> And you like to write, you’re a writer. It’s writing.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>If you follow the gospel according to Writer’s Digest, they say you have to blog, you have to blog every day, but if you don’t have anything to say, nobody’s going to listen to your blog.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>You’re better off doing occasional blogs.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>But as far as developing a platform, it’s going to make an agent or a publisher …</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Well, publishers expect you to blog.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>Oh, yeah. It think you really have to do it. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Although if I saw something I loved, I wouldn’t make the decision on whether they blogged or not. What I would do is say they’ve got to be on social media, they ought to blog, they need to have a website, but that for me is not the make or break of the decision.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> Do you take any of those things into consideration, though?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Well, publishers do, and whenever I do a book proposal, I have a section on how the author is going to market themselves. And I tell them they have to have a Facebook page and they ought to blog, but that’s not going to influence a publisher’s decision. I had an author who had 75,000 hits a month on her blog, and I couldn’t get it published. So …</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> One of the things that hasn’t changed in the book business is that people who are in the book business would not be happy in the oil business or selling cars or other kinds of work. They love books. You don’t make a huge amount of money unless you own the company. People who are in the book business often make decisions upon irrational passion. I think, ultimately, the decision to represent a book or buy a book for your company, is very personal, very subjective, and is based upon connecting with it on an emotional level that resonates for you.<br />
<strong><br />
Andy Ross: </strong>Which is why you have to have returns, which is why bookstores need to have returns. If your new line of underwear doesn’t sell for $10, you can usually reduce it to a price where it will sell, whereas if a book was just somebody’s pipe dream, it’s not going to sell for any price. So books are returnable.</p>
<p>Alan Rinzler: Okay, we should finish up. Got any more questions?</p>
<p>Meghan Ward: What’s the last best book you’ve read, or your favorite book that you’ve read in the last six months?</p>
<p>Alan Rinzler: <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Finkler-Question-Man-Booker-Prize/dp/1608196119/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1318271115&#038;sr=8-1">The Finkler Question</a>.</p>
<p>Andy Ross: I threw that down after fifty pages. I couldn’t read that.</p>
<p>Alan Rinzler: I read it twice. See, we don’t agree about everything. And you call yourself a Jew? (laughing)</p>
<p>Meghan Ward: The Finkler Question?</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>The Finkler Question. It won the <a href="http://www.themanbookerprize.com/">Booker Prize</a>. </p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> (To Andy Ross) And you didn’t like it? </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Oh, I got bored very early on.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler: </strong>I want to read it a third time. And all of my friends—except Andy—loved that book. </p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Actually, my wife threw it down, too.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> It’s by a guy named Harold Jacobson in the 60s. It’s English, and it’s about Jews who don’t agree about anything—Jewish identity, Jewish anti-Semitism, that is, Jews hating Jews</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross: </strong>Hey, I can get all that at home.</p>
<p><strong>Alan Rinzler:</strong> It’s very funny, too.</p>
<p><strong>Andy Ross:</strong> Actually, the best book I’ve read recently is the novel I got from the slush pile. It’s a historical novel, and I love it. And the second best novel I read was also something I got—no, it wasn’t slush pile, it was recommended by another agent. Neither of them have been published, and I’m up against those numbers of 250 a year, but I like them better than The Finkler Question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/10/18/editor-alan-rinzler-literary-agent-andy-ross-talk-about-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>10 Steps to Becoming a Self-Publishing Superstar</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/09/06/10-steps-to-becoming-a-self-publishing-superstar/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/09/06/10-steps-to-becoming-a-self-publishing-superstar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 05:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Author Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amanda Hocking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bay Area editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book cover designers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Cory Doctorow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ebooks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H.P. Mallory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[indie publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[John Locke]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Bransford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writerland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=3098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There’s been a lot of brouhaha about self-publishing lately, with the success stories of Joe Konrath, Barry Eisler, Amanda Hocking, and John Locke being tossed around the Internet like a wedding dance video. But is self-publishing for you? Back in June, when I met with Smashwords founder Mark Coker, he had recently been quoted in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There’s been a lot of brouhaha about self-publishing lately, with the success stories of Joe Konrath, Barry Eisler, Amanda Hocking, and John Locke being tossed around the Internet like a wedding dance video. But is self-publishing for you? Back in June, when I met with <a href="http://www.smashwords.com">Smashwords</a> founder Mark Coker, he had recently been quoted in the Washington Post saying, &#8220;We have less than 50 people who are making more than $50,000 per year. We have a lot who don’t sell a single book.&#8221; One author, whose income was quoted in an SF Gate article as being “closer in sales to the average Smashwords author than he is to a Hocking or [Stephanie] McAfee,” said he made about $500 per quarter, or about $2000 a year. Not exactly millions. But those numbers are rising, and more and more authors—either because they&#8217;ve had it with rejections from agents and publishers or because they want full control over their books—are going the e-book route.  If you think you&#8217;re ready to take the plunge, here are ten steps you need to follow in order to become an e-author success.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>1. Write a damn good book.</strong></font></p>
<p>No matter how much marketing you do, your book will not sell if it&#8217;s not well written. Join a writer&#8217;s group, find a critique partner, enroll in an MFA program, attend writers&#8217; conferences and retreats—do whatever you have to do to learn your craft and write, write, write.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>2. Be prepared to work your arse off. </strong></font></p>
<p>You think it&#8217;s difficult to keep up with Twitter and Facebook and blogging now? Self-pubbed authors are doing triple what most of us are doing. Here are a few blog posts about how much work goes into self-publishing (Thanks to <a href="http://www.nathanbransford.com">Nathan Bransford</a> for these links.)</p>
<p>First we have <a href="http://www.locusmag.com/Perspectives/2011/09/cory-doctorow-why-should-anyone-care/comment-page-1/#comment-8786">Cory Doctorow</a> who, after traditionally publishing several books, decided to self-publish his collection of short stories. &#8220;I dramatically underestimated how much work this would be. It’s not impossible, and it’s not horrible work – it’s challenging, exciting stuff, but it’s incredibly time consuming and it can be tough (and expensive).&#8221; </p>
<p>Next we have <a href="http://amandahocking.blogspot.com">Amanda Hocking</a> on why she decided to go with a traditional publisher after her mega-success as a self-published author. In addition to wanting to spend less time marketing and more time writing, Hocking said <a href="http://amandahocking.blogspot.com/2011/07/bit-more-on-my-decision.html">in a recent blog post</a>: &#8220;With St. Martin&#8217;s, I would be able to produce a better quality product that would be more accessible to readers, and I would have the support of a house behind me to help take of some of the strain I&#8217;ve been under so I can focus on writing more books.&#8221;</p>
<p>And finally, author and former literary agent <a href="http://blog.nathanbransford.com">Nathan Bransford</a> on why he chose a traditional publisher despite his huge blog and Twitter followings: &#8220;My editor is amazing &#8230; I don&#8217;t have time to be a self-published author &#8230; Print is still where it&#8217;s at, especially for children&#8217;s books &#8230; I appreciate Penguin&#8217;s cachet &#8230; an advance &#8230; and &#8230; I believe in the traditional publishing process.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even John Locke, who sold <a href="http://thewritersguidetoepublishing.com/still-chasing-the-old-agent-route-to-writing-heaven-wake-up-and-smell-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-5381">one million e-books in five months,</a> <a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/jacketcopy/2011/08/another-self-publishing-phenomenon-goes-traditional-john-locke.html">decided to go the traditional publishing route</a>, but only for his print books.</p>
<p>There is even a hilarious <a href="http://bit.ly/oypksI">video</a> about the  self-pubbed authors lament.</p>
<p>And yet there are people who firmly believe that <a href="http://thewritersguidetoepublishing.com/still-chasing-the-old-agent-route-to-writing-heaven-wake-up-and-smell-the-coffee/comment-page-1#comment-5381">self-publishing is the only way to go</a>, like Mark Williams over at <a href="http://markwilliamsinternational.com/">Mark Williams International</a>, who blogs frequently about self-publishing. And maybe he&#8217;s right. Time will tell.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>3. Know that although most successful self-published authors today are genre writers, memoirists and literary novelists may be the e-books stars of the future.</strong></font></p>
<p>What do Joe Konrath, Barry Eisler, Amanda Hocking, John Locke, and H.P. Mallory all have in common besides being mega-successful self-published authors? They all write genre, which is to say fantasy, sci-fi, romance, thrillers, etc. However, as Nathan Bransford pointed out today, <a href="http://blog.nathanbransford.com/2011/09/self-publishing-and-literary-fiction.html">that doesn&#8217;t mean that memoir and literary fiction writers cannot self-publish</a>, too. A few examples are C.Y. Gopinath&#8217;s <em>The Book of Answers</em>, Jim Hanas&#8217;s <em>Why They Cried</em>, and Dawn Tripp&#8217;s<em> Game of Secrets</em>. Like Bransford says, we should keep on eye on <a href="http://www.themillions.com/">The Millions</a>, <a href="http://htmlgiant.com/">HTMLGiant</a>, and <a href="http://www.bookslut.com/">Bookslut</a> for more. </p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>4. Hire a freelance editor and book designer.</strong></font></p>
<p>If you do decide to self-publish, you should hire a freelance editor (even if you have excellent editing skills yourself) and book designer, so that your book is as professional as it would be if it were published by one of the Big 6. It&#8217;s important that your prose be as well written and typo-free as possible if you want to stand a chance against the gazillions of other books out there. And people do judge books by their covers, even e-books. H.P. Mallory says in her e-book <em><a href="http://www.amazon.com/-Books-Guide-Published-Author-ebook/dp/B005FM7P7E/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1315372129&#038;sr=8-1">How I Sold 200,000 E-Books</a></em>, &#8220;Customers absolutely judge books by their covers—my readers tell me all the time that they first took a chance on my books because they were attracted by the covers.&#8221; Mallory&#8217;s <a href="http://hpmallory.com/Available%20Now/availablenow.html">covers are FANTASTIC</a>, but unless you have a lot of design and PhotoShop experience, you should hire a professional cover designer.</p>
<p>But while freelance editors are <a href="http://www.meghanward.com/editing.html">easy to find</a>, where can you find a book cover designer that will deliver a quality cover at an affordable price? One possibility is to sign up for Mark&#8217;s List, a list Mark Coker at Smashwords has created to help authors find cover designers and formatters for their e-books. Coker himself hired a designer to design <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Minute-Public-Relations-Checklist-ebook/dp/B004ZSYTZA/ref=sr_1_6?s=digital-text&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1315344224&#038;sr=1-6">this book cover</a> for just $45. If you need more cover designer suggestions, visit the <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/resources/">Resources page </a>of this blog or Google book cover designers. To sign up for Mark&#8217;s List, just send an e-mail to list@smashwords.com, and you&#8217;ll receive the list in an e-mail reply.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>5. Decide whether you want to publish your book exclusively as an e-book or as print-on-demand.</strong></font></p>
<p>The days of print-on-demand are waning. Today, most authors who self-publish do it exclusively through the e-book format because <strong>a)</strong> It&#8217;s cheaper and <strong>b)</strong> You&#8217;re not likely to get your self-published book distributed ito bookstores anyway. If you do want to offer a print version for Aunt Caroline and everyone else who still reads books the old-fashioned way, the best way to do that is through Amazon&#8217;s <a href="http://www.createspace.com">CreateSpace</a>. <a href="http://www.lulu.com">Lulu</a> is another big name in print-on-demand publishing, but CreateSpace seems to be dominating the sector. For a review of four of the top POD companies, read <a href="http://www.makeuseof.com/tag/top-4-online-selfpublishers-book-write/">this review</a>.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>6. Do your research.</strong></font></p>
<p>If you do decide to go the e-book route, first read <a href="http://authorbootcamp.com/content/book-review-john-lockes-how-i-sold-1-million-ebooks-5-months">this review</a> of John Locke’s “How I Sold 1 Million Kindle E-Books in Five Months” ($4.99) and <a href="http://on.wsj.com/riRgPF">this article in the WSJ:</a>. Then read <a href="http://www.amazon.com/How-Sold-Million-eBooks-Months/dp/1935670913/ref=sr_1_7?s=books&#038;ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1315346135&#038;sr=1-7">Locke’s book</a>. </p>
<p>Once you’re done with that, read HP Mallory’s “<a href="http://www.amazon.com/-Books-Guide-Published-Author-ebook/dp/B005FM7P7E/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&#038;qid=1315372129&#038;sr=8-1">How I Sold 200,000 E-books: A Guide For The Self-Published Author</a>” ($5.99). The more you know about self-publishing before you begin, the better.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>7. Decide if you want to upload your e-book yourself to each of the e-book stores, or if you want to hire a company like <a href="http://www.smashwords.com">Smashwords</a>, an e-book distributor, to do it for you.</strong></font></p>
<p>At the moment, Smashwords does not yet have a deal with Amazon. This means that Smashwords will upload your book to the Apple iBook, Kobo, nook, Sony, Diesel and other e-bookstores, but you&#8217;ll have to upload to Amazon yourself. The advantage of using Smashwords is that you only have to format your book twice—once for Smashwords and once for Amazon—instead of many times, which will save you a lot of time, especially when you need to make a correction or an update. To hire a formatter to help you prepare your manuscript for Smashwords and Amazon, you can see Mark&#8217;s list or visit the <a href="http://www.meghanward.com/blog/resources">Resources page</a> on this blog. Whatever you do, <a href="http://www.salon.com/books/2011/03/29/jacqueline_howett_greek_seaman">don&#8217;t do this</a>.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>8. Start marketing early. </strong></font></p>
<p>You&#8217;re probably up to here reading about building your author brand, but that&#8217;s exactly what you need to do—and early. Don&#8217;t wait until your book is out. As <a href="http://sethgodin.typepad.com/seths_blog/2006/08/advice_for_auth.html">Seth Godin has said</a>: &#8220;The best time to start promoting your book is three years before it comes out. Three years to build a reputation, build a permission asset, build a blog, build a following, build credibility and build the connections you&#8217;ll need later.&#8221; Start <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/04/19/blogging-rule-1-keep-it-real/">blogging</a>, create a <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/02/22/fantastic-facebook-fan-pages/">Facebook Page</a>, <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/03/22/10-twitter-tips/">Tweet your butt off</a>, and don&#8217;t forget to <a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/06/21/email-marketing-for-cool-people/">build that e-mail list</a>.</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>9. Create a backlist.</strong></font></p>
<p>The most successful self-published authors make a living by selling readers more than one book. Often they write series, pricing the first book in the series at $.99 in order to hook the reader with the subsequent books following at $2.99 each. (Why $2.99? Because, on Amazon, authors get 70% of the money from the sale of books priced $2.99 and above but 35% of books priced below $2.99). Whether you are writing a series or simply multiple books, you&#8217;ll make the most money by having a backlist. If you only have one book, H.P. Mallory&#8217;s suggestion is to &#8220;consider offering it for free for a limited amount of time. This is a great strategy for building buzz and obtaining reviews at the major retailers.&#8221;</p>
<p><font size="4"><strong>10. Share the love.</strong></font></p>
<p>Don&#8217;t become the woman in the video I linked to above. Don&#8217;t alienate your friends by over-self-promoting. Take time out of your busy schedule to share what you&#8217;ve learned, to promote the work of other writers, and, most of all, to buy and read other people&#8217;s books. Because if you aren&#8217;t buying other books, you certainly can&#8217;t expect people to buy yours.</p>
<p>And now what about you? Have you thought about self-publishing? Why or why not? Have you tried it? How did it work for you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/09/06/10-steps-to-becoming-a-self-publishing-superstar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>63</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Should Self-Published Authors Pay For Reviews?</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/07/26/should-self-published-authors-pay-for-reviews/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/07/26/should-self-published-authors-pay-for-reviews/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Blue Ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[self-published book reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=2878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>When I hear about companies like Blue Ink Review, who charge self-published authors to have their books reviewed by professional book reviewers, I have two thoughts:</p> <p>1. FINALLY! I&#8217;ve been waiting for high quality websites who specialize in self-published book reviews written by professional reviewers to emerge as the gatekeepers of the self-publishing industry.</p> <p>2. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I hear about companies like <a href="http://www.blueinkreview.com/">Blue Ink Review</a>, who charge self-published authors to have their books reviewed by professional book reviewers, I have two thoughts:</p>
<p>1. FINALLY! I&#8217;ve been waiting for high quality websites who specialize in self-published book reviews written by professional reviewers to emerge as the gatekeepers of the self-publishing industry.</p>
<p>2. WHAT? $395 to get your book reviewed within two months? $495 to get your book reviewed within one month? That&#8217;s a lot of money that traditionally published authors don&#8217;t have to fork out. However, companies like Blue Ink need to pay their reviewers, and it takes a lot of time to read and review a book. They need to pay reviewers at least a couple hundred bucks per book to make it worth their while, and they need to make money themselves. So for a company that is not relying on advertising and subscription fees to pay its employees, the price is right.</p>
<p>The fact that reviewers can choose not to have their reviews displayed on the Blue Ink Review website if they are negative also gave me mixed feelings. First, I thought, &#8220;Phew! I wouldn&#8217;t want to pay $495 to have a negative review of my book displayed on their website.&#8221; But then I thought, &#8220;But what about the reader? Isn&#8217;t it cheating her to hide all the negative reviews? She won&#8217;t know if no review means a bad review or no review means the writer didn&#8217;t feel like spending the price of an iPad to have her book critiqued.&#8221;</p>
<p>Overall, I think companies like Blue Ink are a good thing. They give self-published authors the opportunity to have their books reviewed by reputable book reviewers. If those reviews are positive, the authors can use them to market their books and possibly even land book deals with traditional publishers. If they are negative, well, they&#8217;re out an iPad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/07/26/should-self-published-authors-pay-for-reviews/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interview: Ethan Nosowsky, Editor-at-Large, Graywolf Press</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/06/13/interview-ethan-nosowsky-editor-at-large-graywolf-press/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/06/13/interview-ethan-nosowsky-editor-at-large-graywolf-press/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 06:17:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoir]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reading]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Author Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adderall Diaries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author brand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ethan Nosowsky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Graywolf Press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephen Elliott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=2741</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Ethan Nosowsky is Editor-at-Large at Graywolf Press. He is also Consultant for Innovative Literature at the Creative Capital Foundation. Previously he was an editor at Farrar, Straus and Giroux. He has edited books by Jeffery Renard Allen, Emily Barton, Elias Canetti, Geoff Dyer, Stephen Elliott, John Haskell, J. Robert Lennon, and Isaac Bashevis Singer, among [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Ethan-Nosowsky.jpg"><img src="http://meghanward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/Ethan-Nosowsky-264x300.jpg" alt="" title="Ethan Nosowsky" width="198" height="225" class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-2748" /></a>Ethan Nosowsky is Editor-at-Large at <a href="https://www.graywolfpress.org/">Graywolf Press</a>. He is also Consultant for Innovative Literature at the Creative Capital Foundation. Previously he was an editor at Farrar, Straus and Giroux. He has edited books by Jeffery Renard Allen, Emily Barton, Elias Canetti, Geoff Dyer, Stephen Elliott, John Haskell, J. Robert Lennon, and Isaac Bashevis Singer, among many others. He has served on the Creative Arts Committee for the Rockefeller Foundation&#8217;s Bellagio Study and Conference Center, and has been a fiction judge for the National Magazine Awards. He has written for <em>Bookforum</em>, <em>The San Francisco Chronicle</em>, and <em>Threepenny Review</em>.</p>
<p><strong>MW: What are your predictions for the future of publishing?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>I’ve stopped caring about whether people want things as an e-book or as a printed book. A lot of people really want and enjoy their digital books and that’s a really attractive medium. My only concern is with the future of longform prose writing and how people want it and how we’re going to connect the reader to the book—whether they want it electronically or in print. </p>
<p><strong>MW: What do you mean by “connect the reader to the book”?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>I’m talking about a filtering system whereby a publisher does a certain amount of pre-selection, so there’s a certain quality control; makes sure the book is its best possible version of itself; and does a good job of what we used to call marketing. Marketing is an activity that is meant to find the maximum number of readers for your book, so everybody who might be interested in your book will know about it. </p>
<p>The trick for a place like Graywolf is to combine a very old-fashioned approach to acquisitions and editing and tending to an author’s needs with a very newfangled, inventive approach to distribution and marketing. But the basic issues are still there—editorial, distribution, and marketing.</p>
<p><strong>MW: When you say, “newfangled approach,” are you talking about social media?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Social media is just one more thing that is heaped on publishers to do. It’s not a silver bullet. It’s useful and gratifying for authors to connect with their readers in a way that they haven’t been able to, but what makes this work mysterious is that I’ve seen authors who are highly engaged in social media, and I’m not sure it’s helped sell twenty more books. And there are authors who don’t do it whose books are highly successful. I call people who go from one conference to another talking about new media e-vangelists. But it’s not necessarily the answer to publishing’s problems.</p>
<p><strong>MW: What can an author do to get the word out about his/her book?</strong></p>
<p>EN: We have to find ways to get books to readers in whatever form they want, find ways to be in touch with our potential readers and have a two-way channel communication, and we have to encourage new review outlets, in whatever form they might crop up. The old media reviews still count for a lot for prestige, but they don’t necessarily sell books. So we have to get the word out about our books in a lot of different ways that may not even exist yet—whether it’s an interesting podcast show or a new review media online. Obviously the daily newspapers are disappearing. When I think about the review files in the first days of publishing, they were thick—the Kansas City Star, the Raleigh News &#038; Observer, The Austin American-Statesmen—they all had pretty vibrant review sections that were not just reviewing blockbusters. A lot of places don’t even have review sections anymore.<br />
<strong><br />
MW: Do you encourage your authors to use social media?</strong></p>
<p>EN: It’s not any one thing—it’s a density of coverage. Where you used to get that from twenty different newspaper and magazine reviews, now you may get it from five newspaper and magazine interviews, three interviews on a blog, the author’s own activity on a blog, etc. It’s just been dispersed. The sales numbers for a well-reviewed, voice-driven literary novel are not radically different for that kind of book than they were fifteen years ago, but you have to work a lot harder to get that number, and you’re reaching out to a lot of places that didn’t exist fifteen years ago. I think in the last five years, there are a lot more viable and authoritative online review media and web magazines.<br />
<strong><br />
MW: What are some of those online review media and web magazines?</strong></p>
<p>EN: The web magazines are anything from <a href="http://www.therumpus.net">The Rumpus </a>to <a href="http://thefastertimes.com/">The Faster Times</a>, <a href="http://www.guernicamag.com/">Guernica</a>, <a href="http://www.thenervousbreakdown.com">The Nervous Breakdown,</a> and <a href="http://canopycanopycanopy.com/">Triple Canopy</a>. Some are online literary magazines and some are news magazines that put up literary content and do author interviews.</p>
<p><strong>MW: What about bloggers like Maud Newton?</strong></p>
<p>EN: She’s great. She has a ton of followers. I think bloggers will continue to be important, but what I think is interesting is what Tom Lutz is doing with the <a href="http://lareviewofbooks.org/">LA Review of Books</a>. It hasn’t really been launched yet; their website is in a primitive state right now. And I haven’t even mentioned places like <a href="http://www.slate.com">Slate</a> and <a href="http://www.salon.com">Salon</a>, which feel more like old media companies. </p>
<p><strong>MW: Do you recommend your authors do blog tours?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN:</strong> Whether it was thirty years ago or today, you want your authors to do as much publicity as they can stomach. You should always do as much as you have energy for. But publishing has never been a cookie cutter industry. </p>
<p><strong>MW: What about Stephen Elliott? What did he do for <a href="http://www.stephenelliott.com/">The Adderall Diaries</a> (which EN edited for Graywolf in 2009) that worked? </strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Stephen Elliott got a lot of attention for the way he did his book tour for The Adderall Diaries, but he is the last one to say everyone should do it that way. It may be right for him, but it may not be right for other authors. </p>
<p><strong>MW: Can you explain what Stephen did?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Steve wanted 400 galleys from us, and usually a publisher gives two. We all thought at Graywolf that Steve was a natural publicist, but we couldn’t give him 400, so we gave him 40. So he announced on The Rumpus that anyone who wanted a copy of his galley could have one with the condition that they had one week to read it and pass it on their own dime to the next person. So he got a ton of people reading it—he was doing a lot of interviews right before he published the book. It generated a lot of word of mouth, and that is the only thing that really sells books. The problem with that is that it’s not a science-created word of mouth. You have to have a good book. Publishing is not alchemical. In the literary world, you have to start with a book people like. There are a lot of books that are really good books but no one ever hears about for one reason or another, and they disappear without a trace. It’s one of the most frustrating things that happens to you as a publisher or an editor, and it’s devastating to the author, but it does happen. So having word of mouth is no guarantee, but you won’t have word of mouth without a good book. For every book you’re trying to figure out how to get people talking about the book. The challenge and award of publishing is figuring out new ways to do that that are different for every book. Stephen also got a huge amount of old-world professional reviews. Graywolf books get treated pretty well in the media. Book review editors are starting to believe more and more that we have books that are worth reviewing. And it was a good book. It was one of our lead titles for that list when we published it. We all worked really hard on it.</p>
<p><strong>MW: Is it true that Stephen turned down a larger advance to work with you?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN:</strong> It is.</p>
<p><strong>MW: Why?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
EN:</strong> I think it was a combination of my getting what Stephen was doing and his respecting books I had edited. One in particular was Geoff Dyer’s <em>Out of Sheer Rage</em>, and now he says Geoff Dyer owes him $10,000 because he took that much less (laughing). </p>
<p><strong>MW: What are the advantages of being published by a small press vs. a larger press?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN:</strong> A lot more personal attention from your editor to your publicist. You’re more likely to get a higher level of editorial engagement. You’re more likely to be involved in the entirety of the publication process. We let the authors have some input on the jacket design, we try to be transparent about our publicity plans, we’re just very involved very often. We won’t make them write their own catalog copy or jacket copy or get their own blurbs. I don’t think authors are necessarily the best at writing that. If you know how to advertise your book, you might as well self-publish. The other thing is that for certain kinds of books that might be more literary or darker or unconventional in some way, they can get lost on a larger list at one of the larger houses. They tend to stand out more on our list and we know what to do with them, how to handle them. Bigger houses tend to print the book rather than publish it. For certain books where we might be stretching to compete with a moderate advance at a larger house, it means a lot to us, and it might get published more aggressively by us.</p>
<p><strong>MW: What’s the average advance for a Graywolf book?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Our advances for fiction and nonfiction tend to range from $5000 to $20,000. A third of our list is poetry, a third fiction, and a third nonfiction. At big houses, advances go into the stratosphere, but I’d say for the kinds of books that we publish that might also be at home at literary imprints at big houses, they can be comparable. We often pay less, and we lose a lot of books not irregularly because they’re willing to pay more for them, but I used to lose books at FSG (Farrar, Straus and Giroux) to bigger houses all the time. There’s often someone willing to pay more than you for a book. That’s just part of being in the business.<br />
<strong><br />
MW: How do fiction, nonfiction and memoir advances compare? </strong></p>
<p><strong>EN:</strong> The fiction market has really collapsed over the last ten years, and the advances have fallen quite a bit. Memoir advances can get high, but they can feel novel-ly, so they tend to range. The thing about memoir is that the publicity can be easier, so we can get off-the-book page coverage, so you’re not relying just on reviews. There may be a feature article on your author. Stephen (Elliott) got a lot of press for how he was marketing The Adderall Diaries. </p>
<p><strong>MW: Does an author need an agent?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Generally you need an agent. A lot of publishers won’t look at unagented manuscripts because the volume is just too heavy. The vast majority of the books we publish are agented. The editor may have been the one to approach the writer, and I’m happy to connect writers to agents. </p>
<p><strong>MW: Why does an author need an agent?</strong><br />
<strong><br />
EN: </strong>Agents are about access, but also about reviewing contracts and taking care of subsidiary rights, whether that be film or foreign rights. There are a lot of moving pieces, and an agent can manage them.<br />
<strong><br />
MW: How has the editor’s role changed over the past fifteen years?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Editors have to be much more cognizant of the marketing and publicity equation of books they are going to acquire. In the bigger companies, much more time is spent in meetings than it used to. Editing very rarely happens during the workday. </p>
<p><strong>MW: What are editors doing during the workday?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>You could be doing anything from writing copy for books or going through proof corrections, writing notes to reviewers, which publicists do, but editors often do, too, chasing down leads, finding people to read foreign novels. </p>
<p><strong>MW: You hear more and more that editors don’t edit the way they used to, that a book has to be really perfect before it’s sold.</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>I know a lot of editors, and all of them seem to be editing. Either some people are lying or the editors I know are old-fashioned editors. But not all books get that attention, and sometimes you have a really bad match between editor and author. Having a bad editor can be like having a bad shrink. You can do real damage to your book by getting the wrong advice.</p>
<p><strong>MW: Should a author hire a freelance editor?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>Freelance editors can be very expensive, and agents can be tremendously helpful. They might clarify whether you need one or want one. But given how difficult the market is right now, you want to give yourself the best possible chance you can to sell your book, so whatever you can do to increase your odds, you should. Some agents have a very good editorial brain and can do that detailed work for you. The truth of all of these things for an aspiring writer is that you need to make it the best possible book you can make it, and once you’ve done that, then you worry about the marketing part. If there are things you know are wrong with it, don’t send it out. You can’t send it out and say, “Well, I know this part is flat, but I’m going to fix it.” Fix it. It’s better to go slower. I like doing editorial work, but I have to be able to see what the book wants to be. That has to be clear to me. </p>
<p><strong>MW: How difficult IS the market right now?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN:</strong> It’s doing a little better than it was a few years ago. E-book sales are increasing in volume and are a not-insignificant source of income. Publishers can imagine a future for themselves now. But I think the bigger publishers are becoming a lot more conservative. Knopf, Viking, and FSG are all still publishing fantastic books, but they aren’t as willing to take as many chances.</p>
<p><strong>MW: What do you think about self-publishing?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN:</strong> Self-Publishing is great. It all depends on what your goals are. If you want a certain amount of public acknowledgment of your work, if you want your book reviewed by mainstream reviewers whether they are online or in print, then you still need a publisher. I’ve been on panels where people seemed almost angry, “Why shouldn’t I self-publish”? and I told them “Go for it. It’s no skin off my back.”</p>
<p><strong>MW: Are you worried that publishers are going to disappear?</strong></p>
<p><strong>EN: </strong>A little. I’m not worried about writers or writing at all. I think there’s a lot of good work out there, and a lot of people still reading. But the question of whether people like me will have the kind of job I have in 10–15 years, I don’t know. It could be bad news for people like me, but I think writing is fine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/06/13/interview-ethan-nosowsky-editor-at-large-graywolf-press/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author Interview: Nathan Bransford Part II</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/04/27/author-interview-nathan-bransford-part-ii/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/04/27/author-interview-nathan-bransford-part-ii/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 18:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Author Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caroline Paul]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Costance Hale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gerard Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacob Wonderbar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Laura Goode]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Meghan Ward]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nathan Bransford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Po Bronson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[San Francisco Writers' Grotto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SF Grotto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Grotto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writerland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=2567</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>As you know if you read/watched Part I of our interview, author Nathan Bransford came to the San Francisco Writers&#8217; Grotto for lunch last week, and I videotaped our interview. This half is really more of a conversation between Nathan and some of the writers at the Grotto, including Po Bronson, Constance Hale, and Caroline [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As you know if you read/watched <A HREF="http://bit.ly/eTHZzF">Part I </A>of our interview, author <A HREF="http://www.nathanbransford.com">Nathan Bransford</A> came to the <A HREF="http://www.sfgrotto.org">San Francisco Writers&#8217; Grotto</A> for lunch last week, and I videotaped our interview. This half is really more of a conversation between Nathan and some of the writers at the Grotto, including Po Bronson, Constance Hale, and Caroline Paul. It&#8217;s broken up into two short videos, so scroll down to see both.</p>
<p>Nathan Bransford is the author of <A HREF="http://youtu.be/2uu3TvAi1Kc"><em> Jacob Wonderbar and the Cosmic Space Kapow</em></A>, a middle grade novel about three kids who blast off into space, break the universe, and have to find their way back home, which will be published by Dial Books for Young Readers in May 2011. He was formerly a literary agent with Curtis Brown Ltd. from 2002 to 2010, but is now a publishing civilian working in the tech industry. He lives in San Francisco.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="512" height="312" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/J4dNiVc8o_E" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong><A HREF="http://www.lauragoode.com">Laura Goode</A>:</strong> I also think, Caroline, that there’s a middle grade that your question left unaddressed, between the traditional publishing model and self-publishing, and that’s small publishers. I’m writing a YA novel that’s coming out in July, and I’m publishing with Candlewick Press, which is a tiny tiny boutique literary press in Boston that does children’s YA stuff, so they’re not in New York. They gave me a really small advance&#8211;I don’t think they even give big advances, but my editor is a dear dear friend, and I’ve never at any point in the editorial process felt that she was pushing me in a direction I didn’t want to go. They altered the cover to please me. I think that too often the game becomes about the advance when in fact the advance is only the beginning point in the long game in writing and making money on books. So I think if you are willing to accept a small advance and eat shit for a while, you can follow the traditional publishing model and retain some control.</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> I think that’s a great point. One of my former clients, Lisa Brockman, who wrote <em>Rock, Paper, Tiger</em>  published by Soho, they sent her on tour, they did so much for her book, much more than what some of the major publishers are doing. It’s the personalized attention. When you go into a bookstore, they know Soho, they know the brand, they know what Soho means. So there’s definitely a place for small publishers who know what they are, who know their niche, and who do it really well. I think that publishers like that are definitely going to still be around because they can really offer an author something. They offer a brand, they offer individualized attention, and they offer things that you can’t do on your own. Major publishers, when they’re really working, do that, but too often things fall through the cracks, and you’re just getting funneled through the system without any individualized attention. So yes, that’s definitely worth remembering.</p>
<p><strong><A HREF="http://www.sinandsyntax.com">Constance Hale</A>:</strong> Say you didn’t have your job at CNET, say you were just writing your books. How much time would you spend a day on social media?</p>
<p><strong><A HREF="http://www.meghanward.com">Meghan Ward</A>:</strong> We want to know how much time you do spend, too.</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> I spend about half an hour to an hour per post, and I write five a week. And then it takes half an hour to an hour to read and respond to comments and forum posts. I don’t spend that much time on Twitter and Facebook. </p>
<p><strong>Constance Hale: </strong>Okay, 85,000 followers, but you don’t spend very much time on Twitter.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward:</strong> But I think he got them from his blog—because his blog was so popular by the time …</p>
<p><strong>Constance Hale:</strong> But you do post on Twitter. You have to feed something …</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> But social media is about having a base somewhere. You use one thing as your base. My blog is my base. That’s where I devote the majority of my energy, and it’s where the majority of people are following me. On Twitter, I just do a couple of tweets a day, but that doesn’t take very long, it takes ten minutes. … I spend a lot of time reading blogs. … I probably spend a half hour to an hour reading blogs, so that’s up to an hour and a half to two hours (per day). … It doesn’t take that much time. </p>
<p><strong>Constance Hale: </strong>That’s a lot of time.</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> It is a lot of time, but it’s not something that’s going to get in the way of a day job plus writing. I don’t ever feel completely overwhelmed in a day.</p>
<p><strong><A HREF="http://www.carolinepaul.com">Caroline Paul</A>: </strong>Plus … even as an agent having a blog brought you more clients.</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> Yes … a lot of my clients came through my blog. It was how I differentiated myself as an agent.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>Do you plan to quit your day job some day?</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> No, no, no. I can’t imagine doing that. I mean, if this blew up to something I couldn’t manage with a day job, but what are the odds? So no, I have no plans to quit my job.</p>
<p>What do you think of the future of blogs?</p>
<p><strong>Rachel Levin: </strong>What do you think about the future of blogs in general?</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> I don’t know. I asked that question on my blog a couple of months ago—have blogs peaked? I don’t think they have, but I think that they are going to continue to evolve. I don’t think that there’s going to be a situation where you can’t start a blog and have it become popular because all the popular blogs area already out there. If anything, if you start a new blogt hat is really really good and really taps into something that doesn’t already exist, it can become so big so quickly. But I think the bar is higher now because there are so many established blog. People already have a roster is they are into it. To crack someone’s attention is hard, but it can still really be done. I think they’ll continue to exist because it’s a format that can provide so much information, so much entertainment, and that can’t be easily reproduced in another form. I don’t know if they’ll get vastly more popular right now, but I can’t imagine them going away either.</p>
<p><strong>Meghan Ward: </strong>Every writer is encouraged to start a blog. How is it possible for every single writer to gain an audience and for everyone to read all those blogs? It’s just not possible.</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> I don’t agree that everyone should. I know that’s what authors are told, but authors are often encouraged to do everything. You have to blog, you have to tweet, you have to post to Facebook, you have to do Tumblr, you have to do this and that. But I don’t believe that. I think everyone is better off doing what they’re good at. If that’s blogging, awesome, do blogging. If it’s Twitter, do Twitter. If you don’t like social media, if you don’t like blogs and Facebook and Twitter then don’t do it. Do what you do like to do. If you’re a good speaker, go speak. If you’re very well connected, go socialize with those people. I think what’s unfortunate about it is that publishers don’t necessarily have the ability to impact a book’s chances in the way that they used to as shelf space disappears and as fewer bookstores. It’s become harder for publishers to really move the needle, so they’re really depending upon authors to do it themselves. So they’re just saying, “Go do it. Go do all of it and then come back and talk to us. But if you’re not enjoying it, it’s not going to work.</p>
<p><iframe title="YouTube video player" width="512" height="312" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/25sNkMB9rds" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Caroline Paul: </strong>Do you have predictions about the publishing industry and where it’s going to be in five years?</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> I don’t have any drastic predictions. I think that publishers are going to stick around. I don’t think that publishers going to disappear off the face of the earth. But I do think that more and more authors, as we move into the e-book era, are going to ask themselves, “Do I really need a publisher?” The reason that everyone has really needed a publisher up to this point is print distribution. If you wanted to reach readers, you absolutely had to have a publisher. But as that goes away, and as we get to 50 percent e-books, 75 percent e-books, close to 100 percent e-books five to ten years from now, you’re not going to need a publisher to reach an audience.</p>
<p><strong>Constance Hale:</strong> So then who does the filtering?</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> The readers do. I compare it to … there are a lot of restaurants out there. There are a lot of movies, there’s a lot of stuff out there, but we find ways of rating and filtering, and word of mouth and all the rest, and it will happen with books as well. I think it’s going to be a combination of critics and crowd sourcing. There will be gatekeepers. There will be people who influence a book’s success, but it doesn’t necessarily need to be publisher.</p>
<p><strong>Constance Hale: </strong>Do you think it’s analogous? Restaurants? So who’s going to be the Yelps and the Zagats? Have those come up yet? Do we have those yet?</p>
<p><strong><A HREF="http://www.pobronson.com">Po Bronson</A>: </strong>Yeah, tons of those. But you can also just look at the way the publishing industry has worked. They buy a book, then you would always hear this story, “Around the house, everyone here is reading this and really liking it.” And you could say that is the publisher being a tastemaker, but actually that is just the publisher being a preliminary market, a pilot market. You could see the Amazon Vines program as another pilot market. You pay money to get your galleys in the system. They can’t force anybody to review it. People who are trusted reviewers in the system get your galleys and review it. And they’re a preliminary market. Some books go into that system and come out with three reviews. Some books go into that system and come out with hundreds and hundreds of reviews. And that’s a market telling you, giving you these signs. And the more publishers see what they do as, in my mind, as pilot markets to see what rises to the top, and not “We know best. We are the kingmakers,” and that they’re not and that they’re really just a pilot market, they would understand what they’re doing and find other ways to correctly do that.</p>
<p><strong>Rachel Levin: </strong>So you think that publishing houses will be just free-floating editors … or no editors?</p>
<p><strong>NB: </strong>Well, I think publishers will continue to serve the biggest books and the biggest authors because they provide a package of services that is really difficult for an author to do on their own. Distribution, production, editing, marketing, publicity, when they’re really on and when all of the pieces are working together, publishers can’t be beat when it comes to that collection of services, when it comes to making and producing and marketing a book. So I think the biggest bestsellers will still be with publishers. But for everyone else, I think it’s going to be interesting to see. Maybe it’s going to be a mixture of self-publishing and small presses. I don’t know.</p>
<p><strong>Caroline Paul: </strong>I recently met an agent who decided that being an agent was a job that had an end date pretty soon, so she’s refashioned herself as an agent still, but for the new writer, which is, “I’m going to help you package your book. I’m going to guide you through this whole process, through the whole thing&#8221;—like a midwife of sorts. But then you can raise the baby.</p>
<p><strong><A HREF="http://www.gerardjones.com">Gerard Jones</A>:</strong> For an upfront fee?</p>
<p><strong>Caroline Paul: </strong>I think it’s an upfront fee. It might be a cut. There might be many models. But I thought that was very foresightful of her.</p>
<p><strong>NB</strong>: So she’s more of a consultant than someone who is placing it with a publisher. I think we’ll see more and more of that.</p>
<p><strong>Po Bronson:</strong> Regarding small publishers … the ones who had an identity and a brand in the marketplace, who basically specialized to some extent, did so much better than the ones who were just little big publishers, little Knopfs. … It&#8217;s interesting that we had Ethan Nosowsky in here from Graywolf [Press]. Back since the 80s, I was one of the people distributing their books and they were a baby Knopf or a baby Norton, and they do need to raise money. They’ve always needed to raise money to make it work, and they do a good job. They’re doing great with Geoff Dyer right now, but those kinds of small publishers have a really hard time in the marketplace. It’s when they really know a market and they can get you into some specialty areas and they have a track record with book sellers … You have to be careful when you’re talking about small publishers whether you’re talking about someone who has a name and a market of a certain type versus ones who are just generalists. I think the smaller publishers who are generalists are going to have the hardest time of all because they don’t have the big books to sustain them and yet they don’t have the capability to get into those little niche markets.</p>
<p><strong>Rob Baedeker: </strong>When the barriers to publishing are so low because anybody can format their book for Kindle or get it out there in some electronic format, how do you rise above the noise level because it seems that that could be deafening?</p>
<p><strong>NB:</strong> You need a first boost, and that’s where social media can play a big role in giving you that initial base of readers, whether that’s ten readers, a hundred, or a thousand. From there, if people like it, they will talk about it and it will go viral. I think everyone needs that boost, and the bigger the boost, the better the chance of it catching on. I think the idea of being just an author and just writing a book and putting it out there, if that ever existed, it definitely doesn’t exist now. It’s important to get that boost somehow. It doesn’t have to be social media; it doesn’t have to be online, but somehow giving that book a boost to give it a chance. But it is really hard to rise above the noise because there is a lot of noise out there. There are so many books coming out all the time and so many other distractions beyond books that it’s hard. </p>
<p><strong>Sabrina Crawford</strong>: There are also so many blogs. I mean … if everybody’s keeping a blog, you can’t be reading every blog.</p>
<p><strong>Po Bronson:</strong> Right, you make your film and no one will watch it, so you may write your book about your film, but then nobody’s paying attention to your books, so you blog, but no one reads your blog, so you tweet, but everybody’s tweeting, so how do you get above of all the other tweeters? … There’s something to be said for just being in the New York Times I suppose  … not that I have an outlet there. I don’t.</p>
<p><strong>Laura Goode: </strong>Are you having events in a couple of weeks?</p>
<p><strong>NB: </strong>May 13 at Books Inc, Opera Plaza, I’m going to have a reading/launch party. Everyone asks how much is social media going to help, and I say, “I don’t know. I’ll tell you in a couple of weeks.” </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2011/04/27/author-interview-nathan-bransford-part-ii/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>18</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author Interview: Alicia Dunams</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/02/19/author-interview-alicia-dunams/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/02/19/author-interview-alicia-dunams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 10:42:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Author Platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Alicia Dunams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author platform]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goal Digger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal brand]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=634</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p> Alicia Dunams is author of the Amazon bestseller Goal Digger. She is a dynamic speaker, book packager, and business coach.</p> <p>In 2007, you self-published a book titled, Goal Digger: Lessons Learned From the Rich Men I Dated. Why did you choose to self-publish? </p> <p>I shopped it around to literary agents and was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alicia.jpg"><img src="http://meghanward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/alicia.jpg" alt="alicia" title="alicia" width="150" height="225" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-635" /></a></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.aliciadunams.com"> Alicia Dunams </A> is author of the Amazon bestseller <A HREF="http://www.goaldigger.com"> Goal Digger</A>.  She is a dynamic speaker, book packager, and business coach.</p>
<p><strong>In 2007, you self-published a book titled, <em><strong>Goal Digger: Lessons Learned From the Rich Men I Dated. </strong></em>Why did you choose to self-publish? </strong></p>
<p>I shopped it around to literary agents and was told I didn’t have a big enough platform to sell a book, so I did it myself. I thought the whole literary agent/traditional publishing route was a block, and I was on a roll. The book was done, and I just wanted it out. The publishing of the book created a certain platform for me.</p>
<p><strong>How can a book be used to build your brand?</strong></p>
<p>I didn’t make money with <em>Goal Digger</em>, but because I published that book, in my first full year of coaching, I made six figures. When I wrote the book, I figured, okay, I wrote the book, how am I going to make money? Because I wasn’t making money selling $15 books. So I started picking up the phone. I called other authors who specialized in wealth creation for women—Loral Langemeier, Christine Comaford, and Marci Shimoff—and I decided to create a seminar. I did it all myself, but I had 13 speakers. I thought I’ll charge $300 and everyone will come—and they didn’t. I got totally burned out, and I think I was in the red. I didn’t know what I was doing, and I was doing everything myself. I marketed the seminar, and a week before Loral Langemeier was in San Jose. I, along with a thousand other people, paid $1000 to see her. And I could hardly give tickets away to my seminar. That was in January, 2008. I wasn’t on any of the social networks. Facebook and Twitter were just getting popular in the business and networking community then.</p>
<p><strong>How many copies of <em><strong>Goal Digger</strong> </em>did you sell?</strong></p>
<p>2500. I printed 3500 and I have about a thousand left. I found that it was tough to sell books, and it’s tough to be in the book peddling business. Writing the book is the easy part. Selling it it hard. You have to have an audience—whether your book is fiction or nonfiction. For fiction, it has to be damn good. For nonfiction books, you have to have a marketing plan in place, people following you. Whether you sell financial products or you’re teaching people how to clean their houses in ten minutes flat, you need to have a following.</p>
<p>You have to build an audience first and then release the product. Before you even write the book, you sell it first. First you create the cover of the book and start promoting it—start marketing it on Twitter—before you even write it. Then when people say, “I can’t wait to read it” you say, “Oh shit, I better write this book.” Because why create a product and have it sitting in your garage? The marketing of the book is more important than the book itself. You want to produce quality work, but you also want to know that the marketing is important. </p>
<p><strong>What tools have you found to be the most useful in building your brand? Facebook? Twitter? Podcasts? Newsletters?</strong></p>
<p>Marketing is a wheel with different rungs. There’s social media, TV and radio publicity … networking and word-of-mouth is huge. There’s traditional marketing, there’s having a blog, and there are press releases, but Internet marketing is the way to go. </p>
<p>They all feed into each other, so you have to have everything. If you’re on <em>View From The Bay</em>, you put it on YouTube, you put it on your blog, you put it on Facebook. One of my clients was on an extremely popular national TV show and sold only 423 books. I’ve had clients who’ve sold thousands of books by marketing them online. Because who’s watching daytime television? People are at work. They’re on the Internet. So you have to take that content and repurpose it. It’s all about repurposing.</p>
<p>Being a guest blogger or being on a podcast is important. People are looking for content—for topics and for products to review. Things don’t die on the Internet. After <em>View From The Bay</em> is over, it dies. Your blog articles can be book chapters and your book chapters can be blog articles.</p>
<p><strong>How do you earn your income? Working as a business coach?</strong></p>
<p>I operate as a business coach, but I help business owners become bestselling authors. I help them use their book as a core for their business. Once they create more revenue streams to their core business and their book builds a platform for their brand, they can create new revenue streams, such as speaking. They can earn online revenue or become high-paid speaking consultants. I prefer clients who already have a business and then they can make a book. For example, there’s a clinical psychologist who has a clinical practice. He’s so specialized in his business that he creates a book and sells the book. People want more from him because they can’t go to his office because he’s in Seattle, so I sit down with him and create an online membership package so people can have access to his most recent research findings from Hoboken, New Jersey. He’s creating a business where he’s making an hourly salary of $150 and now getting speaking engagements for $1000–$2000 a pop, selling his book at those speaking engagements, and getting thousands of people to download his package online. </p>
<p><strong>What effects have you seen of the recent changes in the publishing industry?</strong></p>
<p>There have been extreme changes in the publishing industry. People who have a built-in audience should self-publish. There are two reasons to be in the traditional publishing business—distribution and name recognition. It would be great to have Simon &#038; Schuster or Harper or Penguin publish you, but you still have to do the marketing hustle. Distribution is something you can attain by going to a vanity publisher or becoming your own publisher. There are a lot of people who have pretty significant audiences who are self-publishing because they can make more money. </p>
<p><strong>What do you think of e-books?</strong></p>
<p>I think e-books are good for a lead generation tool to give away a special report or an excerpt from your book, but I think you have to have a real book to have credibility. To get on TV and get publicity, you have to have a physical book. A book being available on Amazon is a big thing. </p>
<p><strong>Is there an e-book version of <em><strong>Goal Digger</strong></em>?</strong></p>
<p>I do have an e-book version of <em>Goal Digger</em>, but it’s not in a Kindle version yet. I just haven’t done it yet.</p>
<p><strong>Tell us more about your networking events.</strong></p>
<p>I have a seminar this Sunday: <A HREF="http://www.authorswhomeanbusiness.eventbrite.com"> Authors Who Mean Business</A>—how to write and publish your business nonfiction book, how to market your message, and how to make more money. It’s a full-day seminar where people are going to leave with an outline of their book, a title for their book, everything they need to get them started. I’m going to walk them through marketing and monetizing. For $95.</p>
<p><strong>Do you have another book planned?</strong></p>
<p>I have thoughts of writing another book, but I’m going to do things a lot differently. I’m going to make sure I have my audience built out before writing it, plenty of pre-marketing. I wouldn’t write it until I knew what people wanted me to write about. The thing about <em>Goal Digger</em> is that it really needed a marketing push and I didn’t have time because I needed to make money. So I went into Plan B mode—consulting and coaching. I feel like there’s a lot of good content in there and if I put any kind of effort into it, I could sell a lot more. I marketed it for about three months and then stopped. I think you need a good three-to-six months lead up and then a year afterwards. In fact, rather than writing another book, I was thinking about doing a revised and expanded version of <em>Goal Digger.</em></p>
<p><strong>What are your long-term career goals?</strong></p>
<p>To be retired by the end of this year. (She laughs) To continue to coach business owners and people who are passionate about what they do. I want to continue to support business owners, I want to build my business to a seven-figure-a-year business and expand. </p>
<p><strong>Who are your inspirations?</strong></p>
<p><A HREF="http://www.tinyurl.com/freebizbook">Victor Cheng</A>, my business coach. Tim Ferris, <em>The 4-Hour Workweek</em>. Daniel Pink. <em>The Three Cups of Tea</em> guy (Greg Mortenson), <em>Leaving Microsoft To Change the World</em> (author John Wood), anyone who is doing social entrepreneurship. I think when you focus on doing good, it automatically comes. </p>
<p><strong>Have you read <em>Free</em> by Chris Anderson?</strong></p>
<p>No. Everything that’s valuable is free, but costs time. You can sit on Twitter all day and it’s free, but you haven’t done your grocery shopping or done your job. </p>
<p><strong>What’s a typical day in the life of Alicia Dunams?</strong></p>
<p>I wake up, get my daughter ready for school and get her off to school. I come back, write my e-mail newsletters—one I write daily and two I write bimonthly. Then I’ll write a blog entry, or have someone on my team help me research and write a blog.  I have a virtual assistant who does administrative and marketing initiatives for me and who also does client work. She writes success quotes and she helps me with setting up appointments. I have a team of ghost writers, editors, and graphic designers who help me on all my client projects. I connect with my team and then I do two or three client calls a day on Tuesdays, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. I usually go to two networking events per week—either in person or social networking. I’m in some networking groups in San Francisco and I go to one-off things and talk business with people. I meet up with friends who are business owners. It’s all about building and sustaining relationships. I end my day around 3 and pick up my daughter and I try not to work at night. And I usually take Fridays off. And I try not to take things too seriously. </p>
<p><strong><br />
Do you have any marketing advice for unpublished authors?</strong></p>
<p>Really starting their marketing strategy is important, either by getting a team or doing it themselves. Provide really great content and value to your subscriber list. Don’t publish your book and expect everyone to buy it. Give them value. Share your life with them for years and years and years. You’ve got to romance them a bit. Give a lot of things for free—speak for free, give content out. I give a lot of knowledge. And you definitely have to start marketing before you write the book. The only thing you should write is the title and the subtitle. If you’re a nonfiction author, write the book, but don’t expect to make money from the book. Think about what your business is, how you’re going to monetize your book. Unless your book is really good or becomes a bestseller, the way you’re going to make money fast is through your business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/02/19/author-interview-alicia-dunams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Link Love</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/01/15/link-love-7/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/01/15/link-love-7/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 03:25:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[E-Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Link Love]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple Tablet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backing up]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DropBox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirkus Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Memoir]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=419</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This week I&#8217;m actually going to post my favorite links on Friday like all the cool people do!</p> <p>Editor Alan Rinzler over at The Book Deal has a detailed post on memoir with seven tips for combating your inner critic.</p> <p>Jacquelyn Wheeler breaks down the pros and cons of self-publishing vs traditional publishing.</p> <p>Shelli [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. This week I&#8217;m actually going to post my favorite links on Friday like all the cool people do!</p>
<p>Editor Alan Rinzler over at The Book Deal has a detailed post on memoir with <A HREF="http://www.alanrinzler.com/blog/2010/01/10/writing-a-memoir-7-tips-for-defeating-your-inner-critic/">seven tips for combating your inner critic</A>.</p>
<p>Jacquelyn Wheeler breaks down the pros and cons of <A HREF="http://bit.ly/79utbF">self-publishing vs traditional publishing</A>.</p>
<p>Shelli at Market My Words wrote a fabulous post back in early December about finding <A HREF="http://bit.ly/8xP5ot">moments of peace amid a very busy life</A>.</p>
<p>A great reminder to <A HREF="http://ktliterary.com/2010/01/back-it-up/">BACK UP</A> from Daphne over at KT Literary. I wrote about this myself <A HREF="http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=65">a while back</A>.</p>
<p>Roni over at Fiction Groupie gives all the nitty gritty details on <A HREF="http://fictiongroupie.blogspot.com/2010/01/structuring-crit-group-online.html">how to structure an online critique group</A>.</p>
<p>Sierra Godfrey outlines different kinds of <A HREF="http://sierragodfrey.blogspot.com/2010/01/word-up-wednesday-trope.html">tropes</A> on her Word Up Wednesday.</p>
<p>According to Publisher&#8217;s Weekly, Kirkus Review <A HREF="http://bit.ly/5YpTSH">will continue publication</A>. Yay!</p>
<p>More fodder for the Apple Tablet Rumor Mill: <A HREF="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/01/12/apple_corners_market_on_10_1_inch_lcd_oled_screens_report.html">Apple Insider reports</A> that all the 10.1-inch screens in Asia have been bought up.  It also reports rumors that the device will have a Magic Mouse-like pad and that <A HREF="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/01/08/apple_tablet_set_for_q2_launch_with_aluminum_casing_report.html">it will come in an aluminum enclosure</A>, but the jury is still out on <A HREF="http://www.appleinsider.com/articles/10/01/12/claims_of_camera_equipped_apple_tablet_disputed.html">whether the tablet will have a camera</A>. According to Mashable, the tablet WILL BE all that it&#8217;s cracked up to be. In fact, it may revolutionize <A HREF="http://m.mashable.com/1806/show/04bd28df5ebb9e4e227012ee16972178&#038;t=5899df0441c3c413aa5891041ca4762c"> these seven industries</A>. There is still debate about what the tablet will be called: iSlate, iGuide and iPad are some of the rumors, with iSlate in the lead. The announcement is still rumored to be scheduled for Jan. 26 at the Yerba Buena Center in San Francisco. I can&#8217;t wait!</p>
<p>Have a great weekend, everybody, and notice that I&#8217;ve added Google Friend Connect to the sidebar, so sign up if you don&#8217;t already have an account and join this site! There will be prizes involved. For real.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/01/15/link-love-7/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Author Interview: Jacquelyn Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/12/11/author-interview-jacquelyn-wheeler/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/12/11/author-interview-jacquelyn-wheeler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 08:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Author Interviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jacquelyn Wheeler]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rising Shadow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Soterians]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Young Adult]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p> <p>Jacquelyn Wheeler is the author of Rising Shadow, a YA sci-fi novel. </p> <p>How long did it take you to write Rising Shadow?</p> <p>It took me about nine weeks to write the first draft and then about nine months to edit it, although during that time I was also working on books two and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://meghanward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Jacquelyn-Wheeler.jpg"><img src="http://meghanward.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Jacquelyn-Wheeler.jpg" alt="Jacquelyn Wheeler" title="Jacquelyn Wheeler" width="200" height="258" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-301" /></a></p>
<p>Jacquelyn Wheeler is the author of <A HREF="http://www.thesoterians.com">Rising Shadow</A>, a YA sci-fi novel. </p>
<p>How long did it take you to write <em>Rising Shadow</em>?</p>
<p>It took me about nine weeks to write the first draft and then about nine months to edit it, although during that time I was also working on books two and three, designing the covers, creating the web site, and learning about self-publishing and marketing. I write on the train every day during my commute, and I write in the evenings after my daughter has gone to bed and on weekends in between everything else. I find that writing in small chunks, such as a twenty-minute train ride, is the only way to go, because if I wait until I have a large block of time, I&#8217;ll never write.</p>
<p>How did you get interested in writing YA? Who or what are your literary inspirations?</p>
<p>I became interested in young adult fiction from reading books to my daughter. It started with Harry Potter—I&#8217;m a HUGE fan of the series. So much so that when my sister first told me her wedding date, I half-jokingly asked her to change it because it was on the day that <em>The Order of the Phoenix</em> was coming out, and I knew I&#8217;d be exhausted from getting the book at midnight and staying up all night reading it. She ended up moving her wedding out a week, in large part because she didn&#8217;t want her matron of honor to have bags under her eyes and a book in her hand at the altar. </p>
<p>After Harry Potter, my daughter and I read the <em>Artemis Fowl </em>books, <em>Eragon</em>, <em>Pretties</em>, and many more. By the time I read <em>Twilight</em>, I was hooked on the genre. <em>Twilight</em> was a revelation for me, because even though I found the writing itself to be a bit wanting, I loved the characters and the story. Realizing that you don&#8217;t have to be a literary genius to tell a great story was what gave me the courage to write my novels.</p>
<p>Had you had any formal training?</p>
<p>I took some creative writing classes in college, and I&#8217;ve read a couple books on writing fiction, but most of my training has been in technical writing, which is what I do for my day job.</p>
<p>So many writers are plagued with self-doubt. They have trouble being disciplined and staying motivated. What is your secret?</p>
<p>I think the fact that I&#8217;m so busy actually makes it easier to stay motivated. My job is ridiculously stressful, and I get very excited toward the end of the day knowing that soon I&#8217;ll be on the train and can dive into working on my books. They&#8217;re a very important escape for me. Also, self-publishing takes away the pressure of trying to write specifically to please an agent or a publisher. I can write whatever I want, knowing that there&#8217;s no gatekeeper whose test I have to pass before my work can make it out into the world. I don&#8217;t know if I&#8217;ll ever be famous, but it doesn&#8217;t matter, because I love the world I&#8217;m creating in my books, I enjoy writing and rereading them, and some percentage of the billions of people in this world are going to enjoy them, too. Not setting out to achieve critical acclaim makes it easy to write from your heart and just have fun doing it.</p>
<p>What is your goal as a writer?</p>
<p>To tell a great story that sucks you in. To make you laugh. And to gasp. And hopefully not to make you laugh when I intended to make you gasp.</p>
<p>What are your publishing goals?</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t have any hard targets. <em>Rising Shadow </em>is available on Amazon, and I&#8217;m just now getting it into distribution via Lightning Source, so I&#8217;d like to see it start being carried by some independent bookstores. I donate 20 percent of my royalties to the charities listed on my web site (www.soterians.com), so I&#8217;d love to make enough sales to be able to make more significant contributions to those charities.</p>
<p>What made you decide to self-publish?</p>
<p>In the beginning, I tried querying agents, but I quickly came to loathe the process. The whole carnival of trying to write a catchy query letter to hook an agent, so that you can then try to get a publisher, so that you can then try to get attention from their marketing department, who will ignore your book when it comes out two years later and you still have to do all your own publicity anyway—well, let&#8217;s just say it wasn&#8217;t a match for my temperament. I then signed up with iUniverse, thinking that might be a good hybrid approach, and it was wonderful at first to finally have someone who would answer my phone calls and emails, but I was not at all happy with their services. Finally, I chose to self-publish through CreateSpace (Amazon&#8217;s print-on-demand service), and it was perfect. Self-publishing allowed me to work on my own timetable and completely control the process, but because it&#8217;s print-on-demand, I didn&#8217;t have to print a huge run and fill my garage with boxes of inventory. And almost exactly a year after I first got the idea for <em>Rising Shadow</em>, I was holding a copy of it in my hand and was selling it on Amazon. It&#8217;s been a fantastic way to go.</p>
<p>Self-publishing doesn’t have the cachet that publishing through a traditional publisher has. A lot of people still consider it “vanity publishing,” as evidenced by the decision by Romance Writers of America to oust Harlequin two weeks ago after Harlequin announced the opening of a self-publishing branch called Harlequin Horizons (now called DellArte Press). And yet self-publishing is becoming more and more popular as writers like Kemble Scott, whose book <em>The Sower</em> made it onto the <em>San Francisco Chronicle</em>&#8216;s bestseller list after he self-published on Scribd.com. What do you see in the future of self-publishing?</p>
<p>The people who scoff at self-publishing are those who a) are basing their prejudice on the past and haven&#8217;t bothered to read some of the great work that&#8217;s now coming out by self-published authors, or b) worked so hard to get published by a traditional publisher that they can&#8217;t stand it that it could be as simple as uploading your files to a web site. I understand where they&#8217;re coming from, but they&#8217;re ignoring reality. The entire landscape of publishing is changing, whether you&#8217;re talking about novels or newspapers. Agents will no longer be the gatekeepers, but that doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s going to be a vast, chaotic sea of crap one must wade through to find quality books. Instead, I think bloggers and your networks on sites like GoodReads and Scribd are the new filtering mechanisms. It&#8217;s a much more natural system: You find people whose taste is aligned with yours and you share recommendations. And because there are so many bloggers now, authors can send very targeted requests to the bloggers most likely to appreciate their work, which means the review of that book is read by the most appropriate audience for that book. So I think that the new era of publishing means that it&#8217;s actually much easier for authors and readers to find each other, and only a well-written book, whether self-published or traditionally published, will get the positive buzz required for it to take off.</p>
<p>Do you have any self-publishing tips for authors? Marketing advice?</p>
<p>If you self-publish, you still need an editor. Get as many people to read your book as possible, but also hire a professional editor to do a final pass. Also, if you don&#8217;t have the skills to create the cover, hire a graphic designer to help you out. CreateSpace has a cover-creator tool, but you really need to think carefully about your brand and not just slap something together. Sites like Dreamstime.com have stock photos you can use on your cover, but read the contract carefully, because some of them like Shutterstock explicitly forbid you from using their images on print-on-demand books (I verified it with their legal department—doesn&#8217;t make sense to me, but it&#8217;s true). </p>
<p>For marketing, try to do something every day. I have a fan page on Facebook and a Twitter account, and I post something that would be of interest to my readers every day on each of them. I try to send out a press release or an email to a blogger every couple of days, and I keep a spreadsheet of all my contacts and press so that when someone replies, I can go back and see when I contacted them and what the context was. I&#8217;ve also found that advertising on Facebook and GoodReads has gotten me a fair amount of traffic and is building my fan base. Lastly, I make my book available for free as a PDF on my web site, Scribd, and Google Books, which is a whole other topic that I write about in my blog. In summary, don&#8217;t be afraid to give it away, because the more buzz you get, the more sales you&#8217;ll eventually have.</p>
<p>Now that Rising Shadow is published, are you working on something else?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m doing final edits on the second book in the series, <em>Merger</em>, and I am about 75 percent done with the first draft of the third book, <em>Fracture</em>. There are going to be five books in the series, so that will keep me busy for a while. After that, I&#8217;ll probably write screenplay versions of all five books, since I think they will work really well as films. I keep getting ideas for other books, but I&#8217;ve promised myself I&#8217;ll finish <em>The Soterians</em> series before I embark on any other projects.</p>
<p>Summary of <em>Rising Shadow</em><br />
Ashlyn Woods just transferred to one of the most beautiful campuses on the west coast, where she can&#8217;t wait to start her life over as a normal college student. But her plans take an unexpected turn when she discovers that she is a Soterian: a person who develops amazing powers when the balance of good and evil shifts too far in evil&#8217;s favor. Soon she and the other Soterians are studying martial arts and learning to use their powers to prevent California from being plunged into chaos. But they quickly discover that they&#8217;re up against a much more dangerous enemy than they anticipated. And when Ashlyn meets Kai, a devastatingly gorgeous guitar player, she realizes she must sacrifice more than she ever imagined.</p>
<p>You can follow Jacquelyn on <A HREF="http://www.twitter.com/soterians">Twitter</A>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/12/11/author-interview-jacquelyn-wheeler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Self-Publishing</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/12/09/self-publishing/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/12/09/self-publishing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 05:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self-Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BookSurge]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CreateSpace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iUniverse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lulu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print-on-demand]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=296</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk on blogs lately about the pros and cons of self-publishing. Until now, self-publishing has been synonymous with vanity publishing, the idea being that there are no gate-keepers to self-publishing. All you need is some money and you can publish a book, no matter how crappy it is. Today, as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s been a lot of talk on blogs lately about the pros and cons of self-publishing. Until now, self-publishing has been synonymous with vanity publishing, the idea being that there are no gate-keepers to self-publishing. All you need is some money and you can publish a book, no matter how crappy it is. Today, as the publishing world rearranges itself, that&#8217;s beginning to change. With more people graduating from MFA programs, more people writing books, more people querying agents, and fewer books getting published, the self-publishing industry is booming. <A HREF="http://www.scribd.com">Scribd</A>, the iTunes of publishing, is a site where authors can post anything from a recipe to a novel and name their price for people to download it. With tens of millions of readers and more than a million documents, it&#8217;s the largest self-publishing site that I know of on the Web. Meanwhile, print-on-demand companies like <A HREF="http://www.iUniverse.com">iUniverse</A>, <A HREF="http://www.lulu.com">Lulu</A> and <A HREF="http://www.xlibris.com">Xlibris</A> (to name a few) offer formatting, editing, proofreading and even book cover design for authors who want as much help as possible, while the lower-end <A HREF="http://www.createspace.com">CreateSpace</A> (formerly BookSurge) is for authors who want to do the design themselves. </p>
<p>My feeling about companies like iUniverse is that they&#8217;re a big ripoff. There are four reasons to self-publish: </p>
<p>1. You tried to get published by a traditional publisher and couldn&#8217;t<br />
2. You don&#8217;t have the patience/desire to query agents and go the traditional publishing route<br />
3. You already have a platform to sell your book (eg. you&#8217;re a motivational speaker who can sell your book at seminars)<br />
4. You&#8217;re writing a memoir, recipe book, etc. for your family and friends</p>
<p>Whatever the case, one of the biggest advantages to self-publishing is that you make way more money per book than you would through a traditional publisher. Rather than keeping 10-15% of the retail price, you get 40-60%. Or not. Print-on-demand companies like iUniverse that offer <A HREF="http://www.iuniverse.com/Packages/PackageCompare.aspx">&#8220;packages&#8221;</A>, work like this: for $600, you get five &#8220;free&#8221; softcover books, and the rest you have to BUY from them at an author&#8217;s volume discount. It&#8217;s not clear from their website how much the author&#8217;s volume discount is, but the package price increases up to $4200 if you want editing, formatting and more &#8220;free&#8221; copies of your book. And this doesn&#8217;t include the dozens of other optional services they provide like an author website or an e-book format, all for additional hundreds of dollars. This is like one of those modeling agencies that offers classes and professional photos to girls who don&#8217;t have a chance at modeling, for several hundreds of dollars. That, my friends, is called a SCAM.</p>
<p>Before I get into some of the other self-publishing options, I want to say that &#8220;global distribution through Amazon.com, Barnes &#038; Noble, etc.&#8221; is also a scam. If you self-publish your book, it will NOT be on the shelves at Barnes &#038; Noble—EVER. It WILL be on BN.com and Amazon.com along with five quadrillion other books. All this means is that if someone already knows about your book, there&#8217;s an avenue through which they can purchase it.</p>
<p>Lulu allows you to keep 80% of the revenue from your book (now we&#8217;re talking) after the manufacturing cost, kind of like Scibd, except that with Scribd there is no manufacturing cost. In fact, Lulu is a sort of Scribd meets POD because you upload your document and name your price, and then when someone buys the book, it&#8217;s printed and mailed to them. (I&#8217;m betting Scribd will soon follow with a similar model that allows readers to buy a printed version of downloadable documents.) Packages at Lulu range from $369-$1369. A much better deal than iUniverse.</p>
<p>Like Lulu, Amazon&#8217;s CreateSpace allows you to name your price. Then it takes 20-60% of that price (depending on where the book is purchased) plus a $1.50 per book fee. So if you sell your book for $12 on Amazon, you&#8217;ll get $5.70 per copy, nearly 48%. That&#8217;s after you&#8217;ve paid for your package, editing, formatting, book cover design, etc. Packages range from $299 to $4346.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d have to do more research to see which is better between Lulu and CreateSpace, but they each look much more appealing than iUniverse.</p>
<p>And now that we&#8217;ve covered the self-publishing options, here are some arguments FOR and AGAINST self-publishing:</p>
<p>FOR<br />
1. You&#8217;ll probably end up doing most of your marketing anyway, so why not get a larger percentage of the royalties (50-80% vs. 10-15%)?</p>
<p>2. As the blogo/Twitto/Internet-o-sphere evolves, new gatekeepers will emerge in the publishing industry: Maybe even a blogger who reviews ONLY self-published books. Imagine that!</p>
<p>3. It&#8217;s empowering! No more kowtowing to agents and publishers! Just get out there and DO IT.</p>
<p>4. With companies like Harlequin&#8217;s new DellArte self-publishing arm, which plans to churn out books that look as professional as Harlequin books, no one will be able to tell the difference between self-published and traditionally published books.</p>
<p>AGAINST<br />
1. Self-published books will never get the respect that traditionally published books have. They will never get reviewed and never distributed in bookstores.</p>
<p>2. Self-published books are a rip-off for the author. Not only does the author have to do all her own marketing, but in order to keep the cost per book down, she has to do all her own editing, formatting, and cover designing as well.</p>
<p>3. If everyone self-publishes, and more traditional publishers open self-publishing branches, readers will be swimming in a sea of sludge, unable to sort the wheat from the chaff (to mix metaphors). With so much junk out there, people may read even less than they already do.</p>
<p>My personal feeling about self-publishing? If I query 100+ agents and still no one wants to represent my book, I&#8217;ll consider it. And if I go that route, I&#8217;ll work my ass off to sell it. But I&#8217;m not ready to give up on the traditional publishing industry yet. Call me old-fashioned.</p>
<p>Tomorrow: An author interview with a YA writer who decided to self-publish. Meanwhile, what are your thoughts on self-publishing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2009/12/09/self-publishing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>12</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

