<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writerland &#187; wrting workshops</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meghanward.com/blog/tag/wrting-workshops/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meghanward.com/blog</link>
	<description>Reading, Writing, and Publishing</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:27:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Equal Parts Criticism and Praise?</title>
		<link>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/07/22/equal-parts-criticism-and-praise/</link>
		<comments>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/07/22/equal-parts-criticism-and-praise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 06:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Meghan Ward</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Craft of Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Revision]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Writing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[You Tell Me]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critique groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[critiques]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[writing groups]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wrting workshops]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meghanward.com/blog/?p=1394</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>In the comments section of my post on How to Critique Other Writers&#8217; Work, a debate ensues. When using the sandwich approach (two slices of positive feedback with a glob of criticism in the middle), do the positive and critical parts of your sandwich need to be equal? If a manuscript needs a lot of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the comments section of my post on How to Critique Other Writers&#8217; Work, <A HREF="http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/07/21/how-to-critique-other-writers-work/comment-page-1/#comment-2423">a debate ensues</A>. When using the sandwich approach (two slices of positive feedback with a glob of criticism in the middle), do the positive and critical parts of your sandwich need to be equal? If a manuscript needs a lot of work, is it still important to give it as much praise as criticism? If a piece is ready to publish, should you still give it as much criticism as praise? If you answer &#8220;No,&#8221; please explain in comments. Thanks for participating!</p>
<p><script type="text/javascript" charset="utf-8" src="http://static.polldaddy.com/p/3509853.js"></script><br />
<noscript><br />
	<a href="http://polldaddy.com/poll/3509853/">Should critiques have equal parts criticism and praise?</a><span style="font-size:9px;"><a href="http://polldaddy.com/features-surveys/">Market Research</a></span><br />
</noscript></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://meghanward.com/blog/2010/07/22/equal-parts-criticism-and-praise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

